leonarski_fandClaude Opus 5
bc3d693721
The score exists so beamline automation can engage a recovery protocol - a two-sweep collection, a goniometer reorientation - with no human in the loop, so its canonical reading is fixed in one place with nothing for a beamline to tune: engage at 0.5, do not below, and NO VALUE is a third state that automation must treat as engage. The error costs are asymmetric - a false negative leaves the data permanently short, a false positive costs minutes of beamtime - and a frame nobody could measure must not be read as a frame measured safe. The 0.5 is derived, not tuned: the score is monotone in the folded miss-angle, so any threshold is a fold-angle gate, and 0.5 gates at fold <= 0.4040 * theta_max (verified root). Engaging on any overlap at all would gate at fold < theta_max, whose perpendicular band alone spans sin(theta_max) per row - 26% of orientation space at 15 deg - and unions over a frame's rows to well over half of all mountings, degenerating the trigger into "always"; at 0.5 the residual missed loss stays below half the cone. Also correct the message-field comment that said the whole cone means "1 - cos theta_max of every shell": an inner shell loses 1 - cos theta(d) at its own, smaller theta(d). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EFEJG6WBQv8th4UJFNe53N
Jungfraujoch
Application to receive data from the PSI JUNGFRAU and EIGER detectors.
All documentation is now placed in docs/ subdirectory and for the current version hosted on Jungfraujoch Read The Docs page.