leonarski_fandClaude Opus 5
6491345fea
Two things the field names hide, both verified in code and both able to mislead a reader into publishing a wrong geometry. The beam centre written here is the PONI - the foot of the perpendicular from the sample to the detector plane - so on a tilted detector it is not where the direct beam lands. That point is D*tan(rot)/pixel away and is GetDirectBeam_pxl(). And the tilt is not written only for the record, which the old comment implied by mentioning nothing but the _process.h5: IndexAndRefine puts it on outcome.experiment, which is the geometry Bragg prediction and integration then run at. It is fitted with the distance frozen and nothing checks the covariance, so the split between the PONI and the tilt is not reproducible between passes even though their sum - the direct beam - is. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EFEJG6WBQv8th4UJFNe53N
Jungfraujoch
Application to receive data from the PSI JUNGFRAU and EIGER detectors.
All documentation is now placed in docs/ subdirectory and for the current version hosted on Jungfraujoch Read The Docs page.