Both pages said in one place that adopting a model's enantiomorph moves no
reflection, and in another that it is applied to the merged reflections and
exchanges the Bijvoet mates. The code (ModelValidation.cpp, AdoptModelFrame)
does the former: the model's group is a label on the written files, I(+)/I(-)
stay as measured, and only the merohedral-ambiguity reindex touches reflection
indices. Say that once, consistently, in CPU_DATA_ANALYSIS.md §14.5 and in the
two RUGNUX.md passages that carried the wrong reading.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EFEJG6WBQv8th4UJFNe53N