leonarski_fandClaude Opus 5
bce8ff8a1f
The comment justified the rule by informative missingness alone - a pixel over the detector's range goes missing BECAUSE the reflection was bright - and explicitly excused a gap, a mask and the sensor edge as unbiased. The code cuts on all of them, so the comment described a narrower rule than the one implemented. The code is right and the reason was incomplete. Renormalising over the surviving pixels is unbiased only while the profile MODEL is exact; lose the peak and the amplitude is set by the wings alone, so the result stops being a measurement of the reflection and becomes a measurement of how well the fitted shape describes it. That holds whatever made the pixel unreadable. The overload remains what motivated the rule and what biases hardest, since the loss then concentrates on the strong low-resolution reflections that are the largest terms of R_meas. Comment only; no logic changes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Jungfraujoch
Application to receive data from the PSI JUNGFRAU and EIGER detectors.
All documentation is now placed in docs/ subdirectory and for the current version hosted on Jungfraujoch Read The Docs page.