6c8ead466a539537836ca0a3fcc6eb91e3af2ff2
The search was CPU-bound: on a 54-chain partial complex ~80% of all CPU samples were the score's FitModelScale grid (and libm's exp under it), with the GPU busy 13 of 37 s. - score_placement fits its scale on the GPU where its structure factors are made there (ModelScaleGPU's FitSolvent / Fit, as the rigid body already does); equal to rounding, the CPU build unchanged. - A model whose expected log-likelihood gain (sum sigma_A^4 / 2, McCoy et al. 2017; sigma_A^2 the part of the scattering one copy is by Matthews, times Luzzati's D^2) is below 10 is not searched for. Over the 193-set survey the lowest eLLG of a placed model is 26; every PAE domain below 24 placed nowhere, so no decision changes. - The likelihood setups made where first needed, one serving both where the reflections are the same. - After a candidate fails its null, the other placed candidates' nulls side by side. - The first copy's placements refined side by side on an engine each; the groups' translation functions side by side; CopyFactors and KnownStructureFactors over threads; the further copies' CopyFactors and gains for the peaks walked all at once; the known-structure TF setup made while the first copy is refined. All exact. Survey replay (193 sets): no decision changes; two R values differ in the 3rd decimal (GPU scale). Alternating runs, MODEL_PRIOR_SECONDS base -> new: 54-chain complex 38.3 -> 14.7, 4mtk 18.3 -> 9.7, 9v16 13.7 -> 8.3 (shared machine, indicative). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EizBKhTqrAYago9KJG3dA3
Jungfraujoch
Application to receive and analyse data from the PSI JUNGFRAU and EIGER detectors, together with
rugnux, its program for processing stored diffraction data - rotation and serial, macromolecular
and small-molecule - from images to merged reflections.
All documentation is now placed in docs/ subdirectory and for the current version hosted on Jungfraujoch Read The Docs page.
Languages
C++
77.9%
HTML
6%
C
4.7%
TypeScript
3.4%
Cuda
3%
Other
4.9%