leonarski_fandClaude Opus 5
2c4b804f70
Build Packages / build:rugnux:aarch64 (cross) (push) Successful in 8m30s
Build Packages / build:windows:nocuda (push) Successful in 16m31s
Build Packages / build:rugnux-tgz (x86_64) (push) Successful in 18m52s
Build Packages / build:windows:cuda (push) Successful in 19m58s
Build Packages / build:viewer-tgz:cpu (push) Successful in 20m47s
Build Packages / build:viewer-tgz:cuda (push) Successful in 22m42s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky9_nocuda) (push) Successful in 23m35s
Build Packages / build:rugnux:windows (push) Successful in 11m16s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky8_nocuda) (push) Successful in 28m4s
Build Packages / build:rpm (ubuntu2204_nocuda) (push) Successful in 28m1s
Build Packages / build:rpm (ubuntu2404_nocuda) (push) Successful in 20m25s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky9_sls9) (push) Successful in 23m41s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky8_sls9) (push) Successful in 27m21s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky9) (push) Successful in 23m43s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky8) (push) Successful in 28m3s
Build Packages / build:rpm (ubuntu2404) (push) Successful in 22m51s
Build Packages / Generate python client (push) Successful in 49s
Build Packages / Create release (push) Skipped
Build Packages / Build documentation (push) Successful in 1m11s
Build Packages / XDS test (durin plugin) (push) Successful in 10m26s
Build Packages / DIALS test (push) Successful in 26m3s
Build Packages / build:rpm (ubuntu2204) (push) Successful in 27m33s
Build Packages / XDS test (JFJoch plugin) (push) Successful in 10m12s
Build Packages / XDS test (neggia plugin) (push) Successful in 9m19s
Build Packages / Unit tests (push) Successful in 1h24m28s
The observation model said its L term was the prescaling correction, and that predictions carry its reciprocal as prescaling_corr. That was true when that one field held everything. It has since been narrowed to Lorentz x polarization, with the sensor's efficiency and the flight path carried beside it, and every site that corrects an intensity multiplies all three - the scaling fits, the merge ingest, the anisotropy analysis and the unmerged export alike. So the model term is the product, not the first factor of it, and a reader implementing against that page would have applied a third of the correction. The header comment on the efficiency factor had the same fossil: it said the total correction is prescaling_corr * qe_corr, written before the flight path existed. The comment two fields below it already said all three, so the file disagreed with itself. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EFEJG6WBQv8th4UJFNe53N
