4 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
leonarski_f	bcb71136ab	Refinement restraints: metal ions bound to their donors by the model's LINK records ... Metal sites were held only by the 1.9 A metal contact of the repulsions; REFMAC restrains the metal LINKs of the coordinate file (its documentation), which was the one geometry term the 0-cycle comparison did not share (one 2.8 A set: bond rmsd 0.018 against REFMAC's 0.042). - monomers/metals.cif: the Monomer Library's own statistics of metal sites (metals.json, LGPL data as the rest of monomers/), cut by update_monomers.py to the metal ions of its compound list and O, N, S donors: mean distance, spread and number of sites per metal, donor element and coordination number. - AddMetalLinks (before prepare_topology): every LINK / struct_conn record between a metal ion and an O, N or S that no link of the dictionary describes (its ZN-CYS, ZN-HIS, FE-CYS, FE-HIS are taken as they are) gets a link of one bond at EmbeddedMetalDistance for the two elements and the ion's coordination - the number of its donor records, symmetry mates included - from the rows resting on at least 20 sites (the coordination's own row, else the neighbours interpolated), sigma their spread (>= 0.02 A); a His or Cys donor loses the proton the bond replaces (DEL-HD1 / DEL-HE2 / CYSmod1, as the library's links do). Records only, no distance search; records to a symmetry mate count for the coordination but are not restrained (bonds to symmetry mates are not, anywhere). - The metal bonds are a restraint set of their own (RefinementTopology::metal_bonds), evaluated with the geometry and reported apart (GeometryStatistics::rmsd_metal, REFINE_RMSD_METAL_BONDS, REFINE_SCORE_RMSD_METAL_BONDS / _BONDS_ALL): their sigma is the spread of real sites, so they sit further from ideal than covalent bonds, and the weight ladder's 0.02 A bound stays a bound on the covalent ones. refine_parity.py compares REFMAC's bond rmsd (links included) with the combined one, and takes --gpu. Score-only geometry against REFMAC 5.8 0-cycle, all bonds (count): 2.8 A Zn/Fe set 0.0402 (4934) vs 0.042 (4935), was 0.0178; a Zn-Cys set 0.0186 (7102) vs 0.019 (7102); a Ca set 0.0297 vs 0.026 (REFMAC also refines the sugars and uses one Ca-O distance); a Mg set 0.0114 vs 0.017 (REFMAC restrains 8 symmetry links and puts Mg-O at 1.99 A, the library's statistics at 2.07). R of the scored model unchanged (+0.0001 on the first from the removed His/Cys protons). Refined R-free with the links vs without: +0.0016, -0.0002, +0.0005, +0.0004. Test: RefinementRestraints_metal_links (Zn-Cys4 by the dictionary's link, Mg(H2O)6 by the new ones, both back at their distances). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015CeEGgpKdfkCTJb3YNMJcu (cherry picked from commit 0fcffc5c71e03e184cff18f07524473462a57b68)	2026-10-26 01:38:24 +01:00
leonarski_f	9da3851844	Refinement: at most n weight trials at a time, and a cancel flag the caller can set ... - RefinementSettings::max_trials_at_once (rugnux_refine_test --trials-at-once): 0 as many as the ladders and the cards take, 1 one after another - the check that side by side changes nothing. Verified: refined model and report identical, side by side vs one after another, GPU (5reo, 9yl4, 6o2h, 9rcs) and CPU engine (6o2h, 9rcs, 5reo), and run to run. - RefinementSettings::cancel, an atomic flag for the broker's live deadline: checked at every iteration of the L-BFGS (positions, B, rigid bodies, group B: the minimiser stops where it stands), at every macro-cycle and before every weight trial. The trials that ran are chosen among as usual; cut before the first, the model is the placement's. RefinementResult::cancelled says so. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015CeEGgpKdfkCTJb3YNMJcu (cherry picked from commit f708d3d227bb42215ffe3d9a15c766dbd73b783c)	2026-10-26 01:38:24 +01:00
leonarski_f	d3673d17fc	RefinementTest: the GPU restraint check on an engine made for a cell its gather takes ... The restraints do not read the cell; the 14 A cell that makes the symmetry contacts is too narrow for the gather's boxes, so the engine was refused. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015CeEGgpKdfkCTJb3YNMJcu (cherry picked from commit a6e00e10ce1798a97d1f054c7553cc9eb6b5cf4b)	2026-10-25 07:20:32 +01:00
leonarski_f	b4b68d368f	Restrained refinement on the GPU: ML amplitude target, FFT gradient, dictionary restraints, R1 + R2 driver, blobs ... RefineModel (Refinement.h) refines a placed model against the merge, reading and writing nothing: - placement stage (R1): every chain of 50+ atoms as a rigid body at once (L-BFGS on six parameters per chain, their gradient from the per-atom one through Ceres jets), then one B shift per residue; - restrained stage (R2): positions and isotropic B of every atom of a residue the embedded dictionary describes, the rest held fixed but kept in Fcalc and the mask; riding hydrogens added by gemmi's topology, moved with their parents, re-placed every macro-cycle. Macro-cycles refit the mask, the scale and bulk solvent (FitModelScale / ModelScaleGPUPool) and the likelihood's D and beta (ML on the free set in resolution bins), rebuild the repulsion pairs (symmetry mates included), then L-BFGS on positions and, where chosen, on B. - weights: a ladder of full refinements at multiples of the gradient-balanced X-ray weight, chosen by R-free within bond/angle bounds (ties to the tighter geometry), then the B refinement tried at its own weights and kept only where it beats B held by more than the tie. The target and its gradient (RefinementXray, RefinementGPU): the Rice/centric amplitude likelihood (RefinementMath.h, shared host/device code), the gradient by Agarwal's FFT method - the adjoint of the reciprocal-space symmetry composition into a half-l (CPU) or half-u (cuFFT) spectrum, one inverse real transform, then each atom's density derivatives (xyz and B) summed over its box. On the GPU everything per evaluation stays on the device: ModelDensityGPU's gather, r2c, a fused compose + likelihood kernel, a CSR gather for the adjoint (no atomics), c2r, one warp per atom for the gradient; the restraints are one kernel per restraint plus a per-atom gather of gradient slots; cub reductions. Deterministic. Restraints (RefinementRestraints): bonds, angles, torsions (with esd, no phi/psi, no alternative sugar puckers), chiral volumes, least-squares planes from gemmi's Topo; repulsions beyond 1-4 (vdW radii from the dictionary's energy library, 2.6 A for H-bond pairs, 1.9 A metal-N/O/S); B similarity of bonded and angle-related atoms. DensityBlobs (D1): gemmi's flood-fill blobs of mFo-DFc above 3 sigma peaking above 4 sigma, placed beside the model and labelled WATER / ION / LIGAND / MODEL_ERROR by distance, contacts, volume and the anomalous map. tools/rugnux_refine_test refines a model against a finished run's p.mtz (developer utility, not installed). Tests: likelihood derivative, the embedded library, restraint values on ideal residues and every restraint kind's gradient against finite differences (CPU, and the GPU against the CPU), the X-ray gradient against finite differences in P1, P212121, C2 and P6122 (CPU and GPU), and a synthetic refinement that recovers a shaken model. Credits in docs/ACKNOWLEDGEMENT.md and at the algorithms. Measured on the open arm's battery outputs against REFMAC 5.8, 10 cycles, same p.mtz, free set and start model (R-free): 5reo 0.2228 vs 0.2236, 8dyz 0.1733 vs 0.1651, 9chw 0.1995 vs 0.1969 (CPU engine). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015CeEGgpKdfkCTJb3YNMJcu (cherry picked from commit 8efe6f2322b3bfdae580bb34f256e67730dfc3c2)	2026-10-25 07:20:32 +01:00