fix tests from mlz repo

- fix omit_unchanged
- names too short
+ other pylint complains
Change-Id: I3c277b461fad1a5fdf8e76ff1cc42b8742d1de16

Change-Id: I58fb64f91bcc2efef20df68f5c63a64315413286

secop/params.py

@@ -367,6 +367,7 @@ class Command(Accessible):
                 self.description = inspect.cleandoc(argument.__doc__)
             self.name = self.func.__name__  # this is probably not needed
         self._inherit = inherit  # save for __set_name__
+        self.ownProperties = self.propertyValues.copy()
 
     def __set_name__(self, owner, name):
         self.name = name
@@ -375,7 +376,6 @@ class Command(Accessible):
                                    (owner.__name__, name))
 
         self.datatype = CommandType(self.argument, self.result)
-        self.ownProperties = self.propertyValues.copy()
         if self.export is True:
             predefined_cls = PREDEFINED_ACCESSIBLES.get(name, None)
             if predefined_cls is Command:

secop/persistent.py

@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ import json
 
 from secop.lib import getGeneralConfig
 from secop.datatypes import EnumType
-from secop.params import Parameter, Property, BoolType, Command
+from secop.params import Parameter, Property, Command
 from secop.modules import HasAccessibles
 
 

test/test_iohandler.py

@@ -71,7 +71,11 @@ class Data:
 
 
 class DispatcherStub:
-    OMIT_UNCHANGED_WITHIN = 0
+    # the first update from the poller comes a very short time after the
+    # initial value from the timestamp. However, in the test below
+    # the second update happens after the updates dict is cleared
+    # -> we have to inhibit the 'omit unchanged update' feature
+    omit_unchanged_within = 0
 
     def __init__(self, updates):
         self.updates = updates
@@ -108,6 +112,7 @@ def test_IOHandler():
     group1 = Hdl('group1', 'SIMPLE?', '%g')
     group2 = Hdl('group2', 'CMD?%(channel)d', '%g,%s,%d')
 
+
     class Module1(Module):
         channel = Property('the channel', IntRange(), default=3)
         loop = Property('the loop', IntRange(), default=2)

test/test_params.py

@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ def test_Override():
     assert id(Mod.p3) == id(Base.p3)
     assert repr(Mod.p2) == repr(Base.p2)  # must be a clone
     assert repr(Mod.p3) == repr(Base.p3)  # must be a clone
-    assert Mod.p1.default == True
+    assert Mod.p1.default is True
     # manipulating default makes Base.p1 and Mod.p1 match
     Mod.p1.default = False
     assert repr(Mod.p1) == repr(Base.p1)

test/test_properties.py

@@ -162,23 +162,23 @@ def test_Property_override():
 
 
 def test_Properties_mro():
-    class A(HasProperties):
-        p = Property('base', StringType(), 'base', export='always')
+    class Base(HasProperties):
+        prop = Property('base', StringType(), 'base', export='always')
 
-    class B(A):
+    class SubA(Base):
         pass
 
-    class C(A):
-        p = Property('sub', FloatRange(), extname='p')
+    class SubB(Base):
+        prop = Property('sub', FloatRange(), extname='prop')
 
-    class D(C, B):
-        p = 1
+    class FinalBA(SubB, SubA):
+        prop = 1
 
-    class E(B, C):
-        p = 2
+    class FinalAB(SubA, SubB):
+        prop = 2
 
-    assert B().exportProperties() == {'_p': 'base'}
-    assert D().exportProperties() == {'p': 1.0}
-    # in an older implementation the following would fail, as B.p is constructed first
-    # and then B.p overrides C.p
-    assert E().exportProperties() == {'p': 2.0}
+    assert SubA().exportProperties() == {'_prop': 'base'}
+    assert FinalBA().exportProperties() == {'prop': 1.0}
+    # in an older implementation the following would fail, as SubA.p is constructed first
+    # and then SubA.p overrides SubB.p
+    assert FinalAB().exportProperties() == {'prop': 2.0}