chore(nidaq): improve readbability of nidaq signal definition #71

Open
wakonig_k wants to merge 1 commits from chore/nidaq_formatter into feat/various-improvements
Owner

To improve the readability of the signal definition in the nidaq ophyd device, I propose to disable the formatter. The PR does not change anything else, just formatting

image.png
To improve the readability of the signal definition in the nidaq ophyd device, I propose to disable the formatter. The PR does not change anything else, just formatting <img width="935" alt="image.png" src="attachments/9d21c252-37a9-403c-af25-a20995979ebf">
1.1 MiB
wakonig_k requested review from appel_c 2026-05-05 11:32:51 +02:00
wakonig_k requested review from clark_a 2026-05-05 11:32:52 +02:00
wakonig_k requested review from hitz_s 2026-05-05 11:32:52 +02:00
Member

I'm fine with the changes, however they should be made in the feat/various-improvements branch, as we edited that file there already quite a bit.

I'm fine with the changes, however they should be made in the feat/various-improvements branch, as we edited that file there already quite a bit.
Author
Owner

@hitz_s I can push it to the branch if you want

@hitz_s I can push it to the branch if you want
Member

Sure, just please use the current order of the signals. It is the order in which they are listed in the gui (for example waveform signal selection).

Sure, just please use the current order of the signals. It is the order in which they are listed in the gui (for example waveform signal selection).
wakonig_k changed target branch from main to feat/various-improvements 2026-05-05 12:45:47 +02:00
wakonig_k added 1 commit 2026-05-05 12:45:47 +02:00
chore(nidaq): improve readbability of nidaq signal definition
CI for debye_bec / test (pull_request) Failing after 1m12s
CI for debye_bec / test (push) Failing after 1m36s
b00b157e3e
Author
Owner

@hitz_s I rebased it on your feature branch and redirected the PR to it.

@hitz_s I rebased it on your feature branch and redirected the PR to it.
Author
Owner

@hitz_s @clark_a I would suggest that we merge your long-standing feature (feat/various-improvements) branch soon. It is already quite long and has been open for quite some time. If you need help with rebasing or cleanup, just let us know!

@hitz_s @clark_a I would suggest that we merge your long-standing feature (feat/various-improvements) branch soon. It is already quite long and has been open for quite some time. If you need help with rebasing or cleanup, just let us know!
Member

Sure, once the digital twin is more or less running.

Sure, once the digital twin is more or less running.
Some checks are pending
CI for debye_bec / test (pull_request) Failing after 1m12s
CI for debye_bec / test (push) Failing after 1m36s
This pull request can be merged automatically.
This branch is out-of-date with the base branch
You are not authorized to merge this pull request.
View command line instructions

Checkout

From your project repository, check out a new branch and test the changes.
git fetch -u origin chore/nidaq_formatter:chore/nidaq_formatter
git checkout chore/nidaq_formatter
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: bec/debye_bec#71