gac berninaandClaude Sonnet 5 91be28b04b Use real JupyterLab Sidecar panels for eco jupyterlab, not Voila's inline layout
Real bug reported after live testing: `eco jupyterlab` rendered the
Namespace launcher as a large inline block (full notebook width, not a
narrow sidebar like eco desktop's dock), and opening a device apparently
popped a Qt window instead of an ipywidgets view. Root cause: eco jupyterlab
was pointed at the same voila_app.ipynb used by `eco webapp`, which renders
everything via eco.widgets.widget_tray.make_namespace_dashboard -- built
for Voila, which (per eco.widgets.jupyter_sidecar's own existing docstring)
has no Lumino shell to dock into at all, so there was never a "narrow
sidebar" option available there in the first place. JupyterLab DOES have a
Lumino shell, and eco already had eco.widgets.jupyter_sidecar.open_in_sidecar
for exactly this -- it just wasn't wired up to the CLI.

- NamespaceLauncherWidget now takes a generic on_open(obj, label) callback
  instead of a hardcoded WidgetTray, so it can drive either a WidgetTray
  panel (Voila/webapp, unchanged) or a Sidecar panel (JupyterLab, new).
- New eco.widgets.jupyter_sidecar.open_namespace_dashboard(): docks the
  Namespace launcher in its own Sidecar panel, and routes each opened
  device into its own Sidecar panel too -- the closest browser-side
  analogue to eco desktop's dockable Namespace panel + tiled device docks.
- New eco/jupyterlab_app.ipynb (packaged; added to package-data, learned
  that lesson the hard way earlier this session) uses it, with its code
  cell collapsed by default (standard nbformat source_hidden metadata) --
  JupyterLab has no server-side route to auto-open a real Console tab (it's
  a frontend-only command, confirmed by grepping jupyterlab's own source
  for any matching handler), so a notebook is still the minimal anchor tab
  needed for Sidecar/ipywidgets to have something to render into; this
  keeps its visible footprint to just the dashboard.
- New _write_jupyterlab_notebook(): opening an *existing* .ipynb always
  uses the kernel named in its own file, not JupyterLab's server-wide
  default -- so eco_cli.py now regenerates a copy with its kernelspec
  pointed at the just-registered eco-<scope> kernel, same as
  _register_eco_kernel's other generated files.

Voila (`eco webapp`) is unchanged -- make_namespace_dashboard/WidgetTray
remains correct there, confirmed working earlier this session.

Verified: the notebook's cell code executes without error against a real
eco-bernina kernel (same mechanism used to verify the kernel registration
earlier), a scripted Sidecar dashboard construction + simulated click
against a fake namespace, and the full test suite (338/340 -- the 2
failures are pre-existing in test_config_lazy_init.py, unrelated).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-21 22:51:38 +02:00
2026-08-18 21:56:17 +02:00
2026-08-18 21:56:17 +02:00
2026-08-21 15:10:25 +02:00
2026-08-18 21:56:17 +02:00
2026-08-18 21:56:17 +02:00
2018-07-06 12:38:44 +02:00
2026-08-18 21:56:17 +02:00
2026-08-18 21:56:17 +02:00
2026-08-18 21:56:17 +02:00
2021-01-13 13:11:22 +01:00
2026-08-18 21:56:17 +02:00
2026-08-21 15:10:25 +02:00
2026-08-21 15:10:25 +02:00
2026-08-21 15:10:25 +02:00
2025-06-24 15:33:02 +02:00

eco — Experiment Control

                       ___ _______
                      / -_) __/ _ \
 Experiment Control   \__/\__/\___/

eco is a Python-based control environment for experiments, developed and used at SwissFEL, PSI. It is used both as:

  • a library of experimental devices for higher-level Python applications or GUIs, and
  • an interactive command-line interface, e.g. from an IPython/Jupyter shell or notebook.

eco follows an object-oriented approach: every device is represented as a Python object with a small, predictable interface, so devices can be freely combined in generic control/acquisition routines and analysed with the scientific Python ecosystem. For a general introduction to object-oriented Python, see e.g. this short introduction.

Documentation

The full documentation — installation, core concepts, and worked examples (listening monitors, archiver data and strip charts, pipeline offload, motor configuration) — lives in docs/ and is built with Sphinx, configured to build on Read the Docs via .readthedocs.yaml.

Build it locally:

pip install -r docs/requirements.txt
sphinx-build -b html docs docs/_build/html

Installation

conda install -c paulscherrerinstitute eco

or, for development, in editable mode from a checkout:

git clone https://github.com/paulscherrerinstitute/eco.git
cd eco
pip install -e .

See Installation for beamline-specific setup (the eco launcher, .ecorc defaults) and the full dependency picture.

Creating a new device

New devices are implemented as a subclass of Assembly, which provides naming, aliasing, and shell representation:

from eco.elements.assembly import Assembly

class MyDevice(Assembly):
    def __init__(self, name=None):
        super().__init__(name=name)
        self._append(MySubObject, name="my_sub_object", is_setting=True, is_status=True)

is_setting=True marks the child as a setting of the assembly (shown by .settings() and captured when settings are saved); is_status=True marks it as contributing to the assembly's .status(). See Representing real devices — the Assembly in the full docs for the rest of the model (Adjustable, Detector, Namespace) and a from-scratch, runnable example of each.

S
Description
Experimental control package
Readme GPL-3.0
8.8 MiB
0 Stars 0 Watchers 0 Forks
Languages
Python 86.7%
HTML 10.4%
Jupyter Notebook 2%
Shell 0.8%