leonarski_fandClaude Opus 5
b650cda037
Build Packages / build:windows:nocuda (push) Successful in 17m27s
Build Packages / build:windows:cuda (push) Successful in 19m59s
Build Packages / build:rugnux:aarch64 (cross) (push) Successful in 9m47s
Build Packages / build:rugnux-tgz (x86_64) (push) Successful in 14m51s
Build Packages / build:viewer-tgz:cpu (push) Successful in 18m35s
Build Packages / build:rugnux:windows (push) Successful in 11m12s
Build Packages / build:viewer-tgz:cuda (push) Successful in 19m19s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky9_nocuda) (push) Successful in 20m1s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky8_nocuda) (push) Successful in 22m38s
Build Packages / build:rpm (ubuntu2204_nocuda) (push) Successful in 19m53s
Build Packages / build:rpm (ubuntu2404_nocuda) (push) Successful in 20m23s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky9_sls9) (push) Successful in 21m56s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky8_sls9) (push) Successful in 27m1s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky9) (push) Successful in 21m37s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky8) (push) Successful in 24m50s
Build Packages / XDS test (durin plugin) (push) Successful in 10m42s
Build Packages / Generate python client (push) Successful in 17s
Build Packages / build:rpm (ubuntu2404) (push) Successful in 20m18s
Build Packages / Create release (push) Skipped
Build Packages / build:rpm (ubuntu2204) (push) Successful in 24m50s
Build Packages / Build documentation (push) Successful in 43s
Build Packages / XDS test (neggia plugin) (push) Successful in 10m9s
Build Packages / XDS test (JFJoch plugin) (push) Successful in 11m5s
Build Packages / DIALS test (push) Successful in 18m12s
Build Packages / Unit tests (push) Successful in 1h27m12s
This reverts commit 6a3ae9c65.
The rotation battery refuses it. The median is clean - zero movement in R_meas and CC1/2, most
crystals untouched or moving in the third decimal, which is what was predicted - but the tail is
not a cost, it is a failure: one crystal's CC1/2 falls from 91.3% to 6.8% with its reflection and
observation counts essentially unchanged, so the intensities are being corrupted rather than the
weak ones discarded. Another loses seven points of R_meas and half its ISa; a third has its
high-shell CC1/2 go negative; a fourth's ISa doubles, which is an error model measuring something
different rather than measuring better.
The change was predicted to cost one to two points of high-shell CC1/2 on crowded patterns, and
that prediction was made on six geometries. Fifty-one say otherwise.
The defect it fixes is real and stays on the record: within the outer background radius of the
array edge the ring is truncated inward while the disk is not, so the surviving ring sits where
the radial background is higher and the reflection reads low - measured at 1.79 counts per pixel
four pixels from a border, and confirmed by a masked gap producing the same bias signed by the
direction of its displacement. Fitting the background over the surviving ring is the right shape
of answer. Doing it per reflection, from a ring that a neighbour mask has often already truncated,
is evidently not.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EFEJG6WBQv8th4UJFNe53N