Files
Jungfraujoch/docs
leonarski_fandClaude Opus 5 c4f4f7e28f Stills: run the background ring to 14 px instead of 12
The reported sigma carries the background ring mean's own error as
(dI/dbkg)^2 * bkg/n_ring, and the stills ring holds only 244 pixels at
r3 = 12 against the rotation default's 408 - so that term is a larger
share of the variance here than anywhere else in the program. r3 = 14
takes the ring to 416.

What normally stops a ring being widened is crowding, since a neighbour
inside the annulus is excluded from it. Stills barely crowd: neighbour
occlusion is 0.000% at both radii on six of the seven datasets scored and
0.721% -> 0.678% on the densest, against most reflections having a
neighbour within 13 px on rotation. Rotation is left alone at 4,6,13,
where the ring already wins by a factor of several.

Measured with the new stills harness over six datasets and 72 shells,
10000 images each, resolution range pinned so both arms share shell
edges, against a control floor that is bit-identical in every column:

  <I/sigma>  +1.23% median over the 56 signal-bearing shells (44/56)
  R_meas     -0.37 points (39/56)
  CC1/2      flat (29/56)
  obs        flat

R_meas is the number to read here. <I/sigma> improving when the ring is
widened is half mechanical - a better background estimate lowers sigma by
construction - whereas R_meas has no sigma in it, so it moves only if the
intensities themselves got better. A prediction from ring pixel counts
alone, made before the run, was 1.6-2.7%; landing at 1.2% with the
profile-fit weighting in the way is the mechanism behaving as expected.

The larger and more consistent effect is the opposite of the risk this
was checked against: reflections discarded for want of a background ring
fall from 2.53-2.88% to 1.87-2.25% on all seven datasets, because a wider
ring reaches past the module gap that starved the narrow one.

Against it: CC1/2 and observation count are flat, and the gain reverses
below <I/sigma> of about 4 - median -0.4% and -0.6% in the two weakest
bands. Roughly a fifth of that is background curvature, which
--background-radial recovers; the rest is not explained.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CHMmeM1d489zvNFT7ZMN2P
2026-08-26 11:26:43 +02:00
..
2026-08-25 13:38:29 +02:00
2026-08-25 08:21:39 +02:00
2026-08-25 13:38:29 +02:00
2026-08-13 17:03:10 +02:00
2026-08-25 08:21:39 +02:00
2026-08-13 17:03:10 +02:00
2026-08-13 17:03:10 +02:00
2025-04-14 11:52:06 +02:00
2024-11-22 21:25:20 +01:00
2026-02-18 16:17:21 +01:00
2025-06-24 16:43:47 +02:00
2024-11-17 14:55:09 +01:00
2026-08-13 17:03:10 +02:00
2024-11-17 14:55:09 +01:00
2026-07-19 09:39:28 +02:00
2026-08-25 08:21:39 +02:00
2026-08-13 17:03:10 +02:00
2026-08-25 08:21:39 +02:00
2026-08-13 17:03:10 +02:00
2025-11-28 12:47:35 +01:00
2026-06-23 20:29:49 +02:00
2026-07-11 07:19:11 +02:00
2024-12-02 21:17:14 +01:00
2024-12-02 21:17:14 +01:00
2026-08-13 17:03:10 +02:00
2026-08-25 08:21:39 +02:00
2026-08-13 17:03:10 +02:00
2024-11-22 21:25:20 +01:00
2026-08-25 08:21:39 +02:00
2026-08-25 08:21:39 +02:00
2026-08-13 17:03:10 +02:00
2026-08-13 17:03:10 +02:00
2026-08-13 17:03:10 +02:00
2026-08-13 17:03:10 +02:00
2024-11-17 14:55:09 +01:00
2024-11-22 21:25:20 +01:00