leonarski_fandClaude Opus 5
fb55645b81
Build Packages / build:viewer-tgz:cpu (push) Successful in 16m51s
Build Packages / build:viewer-tgz:cuda (push) Successful in 18m44s
Build Packages / build:rpm (ubuntu2404_nocuda) (push) Successful in 20m42s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky9_nocuda) (push) Successful in 21m37s
Build Packages / build:rpm (ubuntu2204_nocuda) (push) Successful in 24m37s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky8_nocuda) (push) Successful in 24m48s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky9_sls9) (push) Successful in 20m13s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky8_sls9) (push) Successful in 25m19s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky9) (push) Successful in 23m23s
Build Packages / DIALS test (push) Successful in 21m35s
Build Packages / Generate python client (push) Successful in 40s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky8) (push) Successful in 29m16s
Build Packages / Create release (push) Skipped
Build Packages / build:rpm (ubuntu2404) (push) Successful in 23m17s
Build Packages / XDS test (durin plugin) (push) Successful in 11m5s
Build Packages / Build documentation (push) Successful in 1m14s
Build Packages / build:rpm (ubuntu2204) (push) Successful in 27m29s
Build Packages / XDS test (JFJoch plugin) (push) Successful in 9m21s
Build Packages / XDS test (neggia plugin) (push) Successful in 7m24s
Build Packages / build:windows:nocuda (push) Successful in 13m58s
Build Packages / build:windows:cuda (push) Successful in 16m6s
Build Packages / Unit tests (push) Successful in 1h18m59s
Reverts the profile-radius part of 457b1bfd1; the comparison-script and mosaicity-column changes from that commit are kept. The cap was validated on the rotation battery, which cannot test it: the profile radius feeds `ewald_dist_cutoff` in IndexAndRefine, and that is read only by the STILLS predictors (BraggPrediction/BraggPredictionGPU). The rotation predictors gate on the mosaicity window instead and never look at it. So "no space-group changes, 36 of 37 crystals bit-identical" showed the quantity is inert for rotation, not that capping it is safe - and the one regime where it does act was never exercised. Validating it needs the serial-stills battery, which is a much larger exercise. Until then the arbitrary constant is not worth carrying in a code path nobody measured. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>