leonarski_fandClaude Opus 5
62ca2b24f6
proteinScore and iceScore are saturating scores in [0,1] that answer presence, not quality: a superb crystal and a barely-diffracting one both read near 1, and neither the spot count nor the resolution enters either of them as a term. iceRingScore already reports a magnitude - a ratio, unbounded - which is not a number that can be thresholded; these are. The protein score counts distinct d SHELLS above 5 A rather than spots, so a parasitic ring in the low-resolution band cannot accumulate evidence, and weights each spot against the frame's own median so a scattering of the weakest detections cannot fill a shell either. The ice score carries two channels and takes the stronger: a radial one over the azimuthal profile, which runs the hexagonal and the CUBIC phase as separate hypotheses and decides between them at the end (flash-cooled loops show cubic or stacking-disordered ice at least as often as hexagonal, the two share only three lines, and dropping the cubic hypothesis costs about 5 pp on iced loops), and a spot one that reads an excess on the ice radii against the same band slid to every ice-free offset, which is what catches ice arriving as discrete crystallites and leaving the radial profile flat. Both read d out of the geometry, so both move with a beam-centre error; the centre is not fitted here, and the one they were computed with is written beside them as scoreBeamCenterX/Y so a later rescoring can tell an algorithm disagreement from a geometry one. Ported from validated prototypes and checked against them frame by frame on stored data: mean absolute difference 2.7e-5 (protein), 1.3e-8 (ice radial) and 3.4e-4 (ice spots). On a 41-loop battery the protein score reaches 98.4% of confirmed-protein frames and 0.00% of water frames, and finds no cluster on any water or ice raster. Cost is 0.01 ms/frame for the protein score and 0.08-0.32 ms/frame for the ice score. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EFEJG6WBQv8th4UJFNe53N
33 lines
1.2 KiB
C++
33 lines
1.2 KiB
C++
// SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2024 Filip Leonarski, Paul Scherrer Institute <filip.leonarski@psi.ch>
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0-only
|
|
|
|
#pragma once
|
|
|
|
#include <vector>
|
|
#include <cstdint>
|
|
#include <string>
|
|
#include <optional>
|
|
|
|
enum class PlotType {
|
|
BkgEstimate, AzInt, AzInt1D, SpotCount, SpotCountLowRes, SpotCountIndexed, SpotCountIceRing,
|
|
IndexingRate, IndexingUnitCellLength,
|
|
IndexingUnitCellAngle, ErrorPixels, SaturatedPixels, ImageCollectionEfficiency, ReceiverDelay, ReceiverFreeSendBuf,
|
|
ROISum, ROIMean, ROIMaxCount, ROIPixels, ROIWeightedX, ROIWeightedY, PacketsReceived, MaxValue,
|
|
ResolutionEstimate, ProfileRadius, Mosaicity, BFactor, PixelSum, StrongPixels,
|
|
RefinementBeamX, RefinementBeamY, ImageProcessingTime, IntegratedReflections,
|
|
ImageScaleFactor, ImageScaleCC, CompressionRatio, IndexingLatticeCount, IceRingScore,
|
|
ProteinScore, IceScore
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
enum class PlotAzintUnit {
|
|
Q_recipA, TwoTheta_deg, d_A
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct PlotRequest {
|
|
PlotType type = PlotType::BkgEstimate;
|
|
uint64_t binning = 0;
|
|
bool experimental_coord = false;
|
|
PlotAzintUnit azint_unit = PlotAzintUnit::Q_recipA;
|
|
std::optional<float> fill_value;
|
|
};
|