Files
Jungfraujoch/tests/CalibrationTest.cpp
T
leonarski_fandClaude Opus 5 c1b6030c4f Set the azimuthal reference in the .poni file
An image integrated in pyFAI through our .poni came out with every chi 180 degrees from where it
belongs. pyFAI's in-plane axes are the negatives of ours, so Rot3 needs a half turn on top of the
sign flip. Being a rotation about the beam it leaves 2theta alone - which is why radial integration
was right all along and only the azimuth was wrong, and why a powder-ring check could never have
caught it.

The half turn is needed for the orientation-3 form written before rc.162 as well, so it is not an
artefact of declaring the orientation - the file has been 180 degrees out for as long as it has been
written.

Verified against pyFAI 2026.5.0 on a tilted detector with an off-centre beam, against the lab
positions of the NXmx chain: 2theta to 3.6e-15 deg and chi to 2.8e-14 deg. Then end to end, by
integrating an image in jfjoch's own layout through a .poni the code actually writes: chi lands
within 0.15 deg of physical truth on a 0.5 deg cake bin.

Withdraws two changelog claims. The .poni does negate Rot3, and declaring orientation did not fix
the azimuth: pyFAI's orientation is numerically inert here, so the file was relabelled and not
corrected.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VfYvJT5Nb71suJCowRBn5z
2026-08-23 11:00:42 +02:00

131 lines
7.0 KiB
C++

// SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2026 Filip Leonarski, Paul Scherrer Institute <filip.leonarski@psi.ch>
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0-only
#include <catch2/catch_all.hpp>
#include <cstdio>
#include <fstream>
#include <map>
#include <sstream>
#include "../common/Definitions.h"
#include "../common/JFJochMath.h"
#include "../image_analysis/geom_refinement/Calibrants.h"
#include "../rugnux/RugnuxCalibration.h"
TEST_CASE("Calibrants_LookupIsCaseInsensitive", "[DetGeomCalib]") {
CHECK(CalibrantRings("LaB6") == CalibrantRings("lab6"));
CHECK(CalibrantRings("AgBh") == CalibrantRings("agbh"));
CHECK(CalibrantRings("nonsense").empty());
}
// GuessInitialGeometry pairs the innermost OBSERVED ring with the first entry of this list to fix the
// detector distance, so the first entry has to be a reflection that is really there. Only the primitive
// standard starts at (100): both face-centred ones extinguish it and start at (111), i.e. sqrt(3) times
// further out. Listing a forbidden ring first would scale every calibration by that ratio.
TEST_CASE("Calibrants_FirstRingIsThePresentOne", "[DetGeomCalib]") {
struct Standard { std::string name; double a_A; double first_hkl_norm; };
// sqrt(h^2+k^2+l^2) of the innermost present reflection: LaB6 Pm-3m -> 100, CeO2 Fm-3m and Si Fd-3m -> 111.
const std::vector<Standard> standards = {
{"lab6", LAB6_CELL_A, 1.0},
{"ceo2", 5.4115, std::sqrt(3.0)},
{"si", 5.43102, std::sqrt(3.0)}
};
for (const auto &s : standards) {
const auto q = CalibrantRings(s.name);
REQUIRE(!q.empty());
CHECK(q.front() == Catch::Approx(2.0 * PI * s.first_hkl_norm / s.a_A).epsilon(1e-5));
}
}
// The centring conditions themselves, checked ring by ring rather than only on the first one: an
// extinct reflection anywhere in the list mis-assigns the observed rings around it.
TEST_CASE("Calibrants_CentredStandardsOmitTheExtinctRings", "[DetGeomCalib]") {
auto has_ring = [](const std::vector<float> &q, double a_A, double hkl_norm) {
const auto want = static_cast<float>(2.0 * PI * hkl_norm / a_A);
return std::any_of(q.begin(), q.end(),
[&](float v) { return std::fabs(v - want) < 1e-3f; });
};
const auto ceo2 = CalibrantRings("ceo2");
CHECK(has_ring(ceo2, 5.4115, std::sqrt(3.0))); // 111 - all odd
CHECK(has_ring(ceo2, 5.4115, std::sqrt(4.0))); // 200 - all even
CHECK(has_ring(ceo2, 5.4115, std::sqrt(12.0))); // 222 - all even, present without a glide plane
CHECK_FALSE(has_ring(ceo2, 5.4115, 1.0)); // 100 - mixed parity
CHECK_FALSE(has_ring(ceo2, 5.4115, std::sqrt(2.0))); // 110 - mixed parity
const auto si = CalibrantRings("si");
CHECK(has_ring(si, 5.43102, std::sqrt(3.0))); // 111 - all odd
CHECK(has_ring(si, 5.43102, std::sqrt(8.0))); // 220 - all even, h+k+l = 4n
CHECK_FALSE(has_ring(si, 5.43102, 1.0)); // 100 - mixed parity
CHECK_FALSE(has_ring(si, 5.43102, std::sqrt(4.0))); // 200 - all even, h+k+l = 2
CHECK_FALSE(has_ring(si, 5.43102, std::sqrt(12.0))); // 222 - the diamond glide takes it out
}
// Ice is the reason the calibrant abstraction is a ring list and not a UnitCell: its entries are
// measured ring positions, and enumerating hkl from the hexagonal cell would add rings that are
// systematically absent in P6_3/mmc.
TEST_CASE("Calibrants_IceIsTheMeasuredRingList", "[DetGeomCalib]") {
const auto q = CalibrantRings("ice");
REQUIRE(q.size() == ICE_RING_RES_A.size());
CHECK(std::is_sorted(q.begin(), q.end()));
CHECK(q.front() == Catch::Approx(2.0 * PI / ICE_RING_RES_A[0]).epsilon(1e-5)); // 3.895 A, the widest
}
// pyFAI's Poni1 is the SLOW axis (rows, our y) and Poni2 the FAST axis (columns, our x), both in
// metres. Transposing them produces a file that is silently wrong, so pin the mapping with a geometry
// whose two axes differ.
TEST_CASE("Calibration_PoniFileAxisConvention", "[DetGeomCalib]") {
DiffractionExperiment x(DetJF4M());
x.BeamX_pxl(1000.0f).BeamY_pxl(1275.0f).DetectorDistance_mm(150.0f);
DiffractionGeometry geom = x.GetDiffractionGeometry();
geom.PoniRot1_rad(0.01f).PoniRot2_rad(-0.02f).PoniRot3_rad(0.03f);
const std::string path = "poni_test.poni";
WritePoniFile(path, x, geom);
std::map<std::string, std::string> keys;
std::ifstream f(path);
std::string line;
while (std::getline(f, line)) {
const auto colon = line.find(':');
if (line.empty() || line[0] == '#' || colon == std::string::npos)
continue;
keys[line.substr(0, colon)] = line.substr(colon + 2);
}
f.close();
std::remove(path.c_str());
const double pixel_m = geom.GetPixelSize_mm() * 1e-3;
CHECK(keys["poni_version"] == "2.1");
// orientation 2 = "top left seen from the sample", the MX convention we assemble to. Without it
// pyFAI applies its own default (3, bottom left) and gets the azimuth sense backwards.
CHECK(keys["Detector_config"].find("\"orientation\": 2") != std::string::npos);
// The half pixel is the origin convention (docs/DETECTOR_GEOMETRY.md): our beam centre is
// pixel-centred, pyFAI measures from the edge of the sensor and puts the centre of pixel i at
// (i + 0.5) * pixel size.
// Declaring orientation 2 anchors Poni1 at the top edge, so the same physical point is
// (height - 1 - beam_y) rows down from it.
CHECK(std::stod(keys["Poni1"])
== Catch::Approx((x.GetYPixelsNumConv() - 1 - 1275 + 0.5) * pixel_m)); // slow axis = y
CHECK(std::stod(keys["Poni2"]) == Catch::Approx(1000.5 * pixel_m)); // fast axis = x
CHECK(std::stod(keys["Distance"]) == Catch::Approx(0.150));
// With orientation declared, (Rot1, Rot2, Rot3) = (+rot1, +rot2, -rot3 + pi): a row flip is
// improper, so it reverses rotations about x and about the beam and leaves the one about the
// vertical, and the half turn sets the azimuthal reference - pyFAI's in-plane axes are the
// negatives of ours, so without it every chi is 180 degrees out. Being a rotation about the
// beam it leaves 2theta alone, which is why radial integration was right while the azimuth was
// not. Pinned against pyFAI 2026.5.0 on a tilted detector, against the lab positions of the
// NXmx chain: 2theta to 3.6e-15 deg and chi to 2.8e-14 deg. Do not "fix" these without
// repeating that check - a powder-ring test cannot see rot3, which moves only the azimuth.
CHECK(std::stod(keys["Rot1"]) == Catch::Approx(0.01));
CHECK(std::stod(keys["Rot2"]) == Catch::Approx(-0.02));
CHECK(std::stod(keys["Rot3"]) == Catch::Approx(-0.03 + PI));
CHECK(std::stod(keys["Wavelength"]) == Catch::Approx(geom.GetWavelength_A() * 1e-10));
// max_shape is [rows, cols] - the same slow-then-fast order as Poni1/Poni2.
const std::string shape = "[" + std::to_string(x.GetYPixelsNumConv()) + ", "
+ std::to_string(x.GetXPixelsNumConv()) + "]";
CHECK(keys["Detector_config"].find(shape) != std::string::npos);
}