leonarski_fandClaude Opus 5
1a1e05ad14
Build Packages / build:viewer-tgz:cpu (push) Successful in 7m50s
Build Packages / build:viewer-tgz:cuda (push) Successful in 8m38s
Build Packages / build:rpm (ubuntu2404_nocuda) (push) Successful in 13m32s
Build Packages / build:rpm (ubuntu2204_nocuda) (push) Successful in 14m17s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky8_nocuda) (push) Successful in 14m21s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky8_sls9) (push) Successful in 14m27s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky9_nocuda) (push) Successful in 14m39s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky8) (push) Successful in 11m59s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky9_sls9) (push) Successful in 13m8s
Build Packages / XDS test (durin plugin) (push) Successful in 7m15s
Build Packages / Generate python client (push) Successful in 24s
Build Packages / Build documentation (push) Successful in 1m5s
Build Packages / Create release (push) Skipped
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky9) (push) Successful in 12m28s
Build Packages / build:rpm (ubuntu2404) (push) Successful in 12m50s
Build Packages / build:rpm (ubuntu2204) (push) Successful in 13m18s
Build Packages / DIALS test (push) Successful in 14m17s
Build Packages / XDS test (neggia plugin) (push) Successful in 8m9s
Build Packages / XDS test (JFJoch plugin) (push) Successful in 8m52s
Build Packages / Unit tests (push) Successful in 59m1s
Build Packages / build:windows:nocuda (push) Canceled after 0s
Build Packages / build:windows:cuda (push) Canceled after 0s
ImageSpotFinderGPU::Detect launches its kernel twice, feeding the first pass's strong-pixel bitmap back in so the second recomputes each local background with those pixels excluded and keeps them strong. The CPU finder ran a single pass, so the two returned different spot lists for the same frame and a dataset processed without a GPU did not match one processed with it. It matters for any spot wide enough to reach into its own 31x31 background box: the spot inflates the mean and variance it is then tested against, so its outer pixels fail the SNR test. On the test image added here - a 5x5 core at 300 counts with a one-pixel ring at 25 - a single pass returns the 25-pixel core and 7500 counts where two passes return the full 49 pixels and 8100. pxl_val also becomes int64_t, matching the GPU's pixel_result signature. It was int32_t, so pxl_val * pxl_val overflowed above 46341 counts even though the surrounding sums were already 64-bit. The new parity test compares PixelCount and Count, not just the centroid, which does not move for a symmetric spot whether or not the ring was picked up; it was confirmed to fail against the old single-pass CPU. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>