v1.0.0-rc.127 (#34)
All checks were successful
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky8_nocuda) (push) Successful in 10m51s
Build Packages / build:rpm (ubuntu2404_nocuda) (push) Successful in 8m0s
Build Packages / build:rpm (ubuntu2204_nocuda) (push) Successful in 9m6s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky9_nocuda) (push) Successful in 10m7s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky8_sls9) (push) Successful in 9m47s
Build Packages / Generate python client (push) Successful in 29s
Build Packages / Build documentation (push) Successful in 43s
Build Packages / Create release (push) Has been skipped
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky9_sls9) (push) Successful in 10m46s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky8) (push) Successful in 9m33s
Build Packages / Unit tests (push) Has been skipped
Build Packages / build:rpm (ubuntu2204) (push) Successful in 8m47s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky9) (push) Successful in 9m55s
Build Packages / build:rpm (ubuntu2404) (push) Successful in 9m4s

This is an UNSTABLE release. The release has significant modifications and bug fixes, if things go wrong, it is better to revert to 1.0.0-rc.124.

* jfjoch_broker: Default EIGER readout time is 20 microseconds
* jfjoch_broker: Multiple improvements regarding performance
* jfjoch_broker: Image buffer allows to track frames in preparation and sending
* jfjoch_broker: Dedicated thread for ZeroMQ transmission to better utilize the image buffer
* jfjoch_broker: Experimental implementation of transmission with raw TCP/IP sockets
* jfjoch_writer: Fixes regarding properly closing files in long data collections
* jfjoch_process: Scale & merge has been significantly improved, but it is not yet integrated into mainstream code

Reviewed-on: #34
This commit was merged in pull request #34.
This commit is contained in:
2026-03-02 15:57:12 +01:00
parent 32b681e591
commit f3e0a15d26
205 changed files with 2685 additions and 1046 deletions

View File

@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
#include <catch2/catch_all.hpp>
#include "../common/ImageBuffer.h"
#include "../common/ZeroCopyReturnValue.h"
TEST_CASE("ImageBuffer_Location size") {
ImageBuffer buf(2*1024*1024);
@@ -39,11 +40,28 @@ TEST_CASE("ImageBuffer") {
ZeroCopyReturnValue *ret4 = buf_ctrl.GetImageSlot();
REQUIRE(ret4 == nullptr);
REQUIRE(buf_ctrl.GetStatus().preparation_slots == 4);
REQUIRE(buf_ctrl.GetStatus().sending_slots == 0);
REQUIRE(buf_ctrl.GetStatus().available_slots == 0);
ret0->ReadyToSend();
ret1->ReadyToSend();
REQUIRE(buf_ctrl.GetStatus().preparation_slots == 2);
REQUIRE(buf_ctrl.GetStatus().sending_slots == 2);
REQUIRE(buf_ctrl.GetStatus().available_slots == 0);
ret2->ReadyToSend();
ret3->ReadyToSend();
REQUIRE(buf_ctrl.GetStatus().preparation_slots == 0);
REQUIRE(buf_ctrl.GetStatus().sending_slots == 4);
REQUIRE(buf_ctrl.GetStatus().available_slots == 0);
ret0->release();
ret1->release();
ret2->release();
ret3->release();
REQUIRE(buf_ctrl.GetStatus().available_slots == 4);
REQUIRE(buf_ctrl.GetAvailSlots() == 4);
REQUIRE(buf_ctrl.CheckIfBufferReturned(std::chrono::microseconds(1)));
@@ -113,17 +131,20 @@ TEST_CASE("ImageBuffer_Counter") {
ZeroCopyReturnValue *ret0 = buf_ctrl.GetImageSlot();
REQUIRE(ret0 != nullptr);
ret0->SetImageNumber(0);
ret0->release();
ret0->ReadyToSend();
auto cnt_3 = buf_ctrl.GetStatus().current_counter;
ZeroCopyReturnValue *ret1 = buf_ctrl.GetImageSlot();
REQUIRE(ret1 != nullptr);
ret1->SetImageNumber(1);
ret1->release();
ret1->ReadyToSend();
auto cnt_4 = buf_ctrl.GetStatus().current_counter;
ret0->release();
ret1->release();
REQUIRE(buf_ctrl.Finalize(std::chrono::microseconds(1)));
auto cnt_5 = buf_ctrl.GetStatus().current_counter;
@@ -139,9 +160,6 @@ TEST_CASE("ImageBuffer_Counter") {
CHECK(cnt_4 != cnt_5);
}
TEST_CASE("ImageBuffer_Preview_Access_GetImage_MaxImage") {
DiffractionExperiment experiment(DetJF(18,3,8,36));
@@ -204,7 +222,6 @@ TEST_CASE("ImageBuffer_Restart") {
REQUIRE(buf_ctrl.GetAvailSlots() == 4);
REQUIRE(buf_ctrl.GetStatus().images_in_the_buffer.empty());
ret0 = buf_ctrl.GetImageSlot();
REQUIRE(ret0 != nullptr);
ret0->SetImageNumber(0);