diff --git a/tools/battery/open.json b/tools/battery/open.json
index 3f0187365..33cdc1b18 100644
--- a/tools/battery/open.json
+++ b/tools/battery/open.json
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
  {"id": "6oel", "input": "6oel/1449-8_3_001.img", "ref": {"sg": "F 41 3 2", "sgno": 210, "cell": [328.1, 328.1, 328.1, 90.0, 90.0, 90.0], "dmin": 3.1}, "tags": ["SMV", "cubic"], "tiers": {"smoke": "SMV reader (ADSC), cubic F4132"}},
  {"id": "6p8p", "input": "6p8p/14_12_1_0001.cbf", "ref": {"sg": "P 4", "sgno": 75, "cell": [97.525, 97.525, 60.134, 90.0, 90.0, 90.0], "dmin": 1.635}, "tags": ["cbf", "tetragonal"]},
  {"id": "6pb3", "input": "6pb3/14_16_1_000001.cbf", "ref": {"sg": "P 6", "sgno": 168, "cell": [100.436, 100.436, 48.86, 90.0, 90.0, 120.0], "dmin": 2.048}, "tags": ["cbf", "hexagonal"]},
- {"id": "6pxb", "input": "6pxb/TJB1_3_rachel_1_0001.cbf", "ref": {"sg": "P 32", "sgno": 145, "cell": [64.021, 64.021, 119.447, 90.0, 90.0, 120.0], "dmin": 1.747}, "ref_alternatives": [{"sg": "P 31 1 2", "sgno": 151, "why": "Our merge and POINTLESS (Laue confidence 0.999) both read point group 312, the added two-folds correlate at or above the level of the three-folds nobody disputes, and merging in P 32 1 2 lowers R_meas from 0.0716 to 0.0662 at twice the multiplicity. Against that, the deposited model's six chains pair under the added two-fold at 0.3-0.7 A, which is more than coordinate error at 1.75 A, and ZANUDA settles on a different trigonal supergroup (P 32 2 1) whose operators these data do not support (CC 0.18-0.47 against 0.75-0.99 for P 32 1 2's). Neither answer is established in either direction, so both are accepted"}], "tags": ["cbf", "trigonal"]},
+ {"id": "6pxb", "input": "6pxb/TJB1_3_rachel_1_0001.cbf", "pinned": true, "ref": {"sg": "P 32", "sgno": 145, "cell": [64.021, 64.021, 119.447, 90.0, 90.0, 120.0], "dmin": 1.747}, "ref_alternatives": [{"sg": "P 32 1 2", "sgno": 153, "why": "The deposition merged in point group 3 (its 55502 unique reflections to 1.747 A are what Laue class -3 holds, twice what -3 1 m would) and refined six chains in P 32. The intensities read point group 312 instead: the three added two-folds correlate at 0.98-0.99, at or above the three-folds nobody disputes (0.98), against 0.37-0.40 for the 321 and 622 operators, POINTLESS on our P1 merge picks P -3 1 m (likelihood 1.000), and the reflections centric in 312 but not in 3 are distributed as centric (+435 nats), which a twin law cannot produce. Against that, the deposited chains pair under the added two-fold at 0.3-0.7 A, more than coordinate error at 1.75 A, and the model tells the two indexings apart (R 0.22 against 0.25), so the two-fold may be a near-exact non-crystallographic one; ZANUDA settles on P 32 2 1, whose operators these data do not support. Neither answer is established, so both are accepted; P 31 1 2, which the data cannot separate from P 32 1 2, is accepted as its hand"}], "tags": ["cbf", "trigonal"]},
  {"id": "6pxc", "input": "6pxc/TJB6_1_Rachel_1_0001.cbf", "ref": {"sg": "I 2 2 2", "sgno": 23, "cell": [44.19, 64.827, 87.239, 90.0, 90.0, 90.0], "dmin": 1.6}, "tags": ["cbf", "orthorhombic"]},
  {"id": "6r72", "input": "6r72/V-CK63-8-ld_1_master.h5", "ref": {"sg": "P 1 21 1", "sgno": 4, "cell": [117.805, 110.754, 155.615, 90.0, 93.23, 90.0], "dmin": 3.95}, "pinned": true, "tags": ["h5", "monoclinic"]},
  {"id": "6rlr", "input": "6rlr/_b4_1_master.h5", "ref": {"sg": "P 1", "sgno": 1, "cell": [39.986, 39.998, 63.643, 80.39, 76.29, 68.15], "dmin": 2.0}, "tags": ["h5", "triclinic", "twin"]},