v1.0.0-rc.129 (#36)
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky8_nocuda) (push) Successful in 11m14s
Build Packages / build:rpm (ubuntu2204_nocuda) (push) Successful in 10m43s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky9_nocuda) (push) Successful in 11m35s
Build Packages / build:rpm (ubuntu2404_nocuda) (push) Successful in 9m20s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky8_sls9) (push) Successful in 10m23s
Build Packages / Generate python client (push) Successful in 39s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky9_sls9) (push) Successful in 11m24s
Build Packages / Create release (push) Has been skipped
Build Packages / Build documentation (push) Successful in 1m0s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky8) (push) Successful in 10m35s
Build Packages / build:rpm (ubuntu2204) (push) Successful in 10m35s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky9) (push) Successful in 11m17s
Build Packages / build:rpm (ubuntu2404) (push) Successful in 9m9s
Build Packages / Unit tests (push) Failing after 1h18m57s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky8_nocuda) (push) Successful in 11m14s
Build Packages / build:rpm (ubuntu2204_nocuda) (push) Successful in 10m43s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky9_nocuda) (push) Successful in 11m35s
Build Packages / build:rpm (ubuntu2404_nocuda) (push) Successful in 9m20s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky8_sls9) (push) Successful in 10m23s
Build Packages / Generate python client (push) Successful in 39s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky9_sls9) (push) Successful in 11m24s
Build Packages / Create release (push) Has been skipped
Build Packages / Build documentation (push) Successful in 1m0s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky8) (push) Successful in 10m35s
Build Packages / build:rpm (ubuntu2204) (push) Successful in 10m35s
Build Packages / build:rpm (rocky9) (push) Successful in 11m17s
Build Packages / build:rpm (ubuntu2404) (push) Successful in 9m9s
Build Packages / Unit tests (push) Failing after 1h18m57s
This is an UNSTABLE release. The release has significant modifications and bug fixes, if things go wrong, it is better to revert to 1.0.0-rc.124. * jfjoch_broker: Significant improvements in TCP image socket, as a viable alternative for ZeroMQ sockets (only a single port on broker side, dynamically change number of writers, acknowledgments for written files) * jfjoch_broker: Delta phi is calculated also for still data in Bragg prediction * jfjoch_broker: Image pusher statistics are accessible via the REST interface * jfjoch_writer: Supports TCP image socket and for these auto-forking option Reviewed-on: #36 Co-authored-by: Filip Leonarski <filip.leonarski@psi.ch> Co-committed-by: Filip Leonarski <filip.leonarski@psi.ch>
This commit was merged in pull request #36.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ Name | Type | Description | Notes
|
||||
**images_expected** | **int** | | [optional]
|
||||
**images_collected** | **int** | Images collected by the receiver. This number will be lower than images expected if there were issues with data collection performance. | [optional]
|
||||
**images_sent** | **int** | Images sent to the writer. The value does not include images discarded by lossy compression filter and images not forwarded due to full ZeroMQ queue. | [optional]
|
||||
**images_written** | **int** | Images successfully written to disk. The value is live updated for TCP/IP socket and direct HDF5 writer, while for ZeroMQ it is only updated at the end of experiment. | [optional]
|
||||
**images_discarded_lossy_compression** | **int** | Images discarded by the lossy compression filter | [optional]
|
||||
**max_image_number_sent** | **int** | | [optional]
|
||||
**collection_efficiency** | **float** | | [optional]
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user