duan_jandClaude Fable 5
6b34fd80bb
CI / lint (push) Skipped
CI / test (3.12) (push) Skipped
CI / test (3.13) (push) Skipped
CI / test-with-beamline-plugins (pxi_bec) (push) Skipped
CI / test-with-beamline-plugins (pxii_bec) (push) Skipped
CI / test-with-beamline-plugins (pxiii_bec) (push) Skipped
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 59s
CI / test (3.12) (pull_request) Successful in 1m15s
CI / test (3.14) (pull_request) Successful in 1m17s
CI / test (3.13) (pull_request) Successful in 1m21s
CI / test-with-beamline-plugins (pxi_bec) (pull_request) Successful in 1m22s
CI / test-with-beamline-plugins (pxii_bec) (pull_request) Successful in 1m25s
CI / test-with-beamline-plugins (pxiii_bec) (pull_request) Successful in 1m37s
CI / test-with-coverage (pull_request) Successful in 1m51s
CI / coverage-analysis (pull_request) Successful in 4s
The shared "Rotation transmission" row sat in the top rows of BOTH the Gridscan and Rotation tabs, where it read as one setting for everything (and as nonsense in the Gridscan tab). Now each tab places its own row: Gridscan keeps "Transmission" with the shared resolution/distance rows, and the Rotation tab moves "Rotation transmission" below the Screening block and its Run button, as the first row of the Rotation section - next to the fields it actually applies to. Screening keeps its separate "Screening transmission". No behavior change: same field, same spreadsheet/user-value handling, only the label and the placement. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>