linse/sics
0
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Stop pylint complaining about unimplemented abstract methods.

Browse Source 
But instantiating an apparently abstract class didn't bother Python???
This commit is contained in:
Ferdi Franceschini
2014-07-06 11:14:36 +10:00
parent 13c837d9b5
commit 8a6004e12d
1 changed files with 15 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

15
site_ansto/instrument/util/config_edit.py
View File

@ -65,6 +65,13 @@ class RadioButtonListWalker(urwid.SimpleListWalker):
super(RadioButtonListWalker, self).__init__(mapped_rb_list) super(RadioButtonListWalker, self).__init__(mapped_rb_list)
return return
def set_modified_callback(self, callback):
"""This is an abstract method in SimpleListWalker.
The urwid doc says use connect_signal(lw, 'modified', callback) instead.
"""
slw = super(RadioButtonListWalker, self)
urwid.connect_signal(slw, 'modified', callback)
return
class CheckBoxListWalker(urwid.SimpleListWalker): class CheckBoxListWalker(urwid.SimpleListWalker):
@ -93,6 +100,14 @@ class CheckBoxListWalker(urwid.SimpleListWalker):
super(CheckBoxListWalker, self).__init__(mapped_cb_list) super(CheckBoxListWalker, self).__init__(mapped_cb_list)
return return
def set_modified_callback(self, callback):
"""This is an abstract method in SimpleListWalker.
The urwid doc says use connect_signal(lw, 'modified', callback) instead.
"""
slw = super(CheckBoxListWalker, self)
urwid.connect_signal(slw, 'modified', callback)
return
class OptionListWalker(CheckBoxListWalker): class OptionListWalker(CheckBoxListWalker):