- created secop_v2017-09-14.rst, based on the GoogleDocs SECoP Preliminary V2016-11-30 (rc 2) - this Document is supposed to contain the full SECoP standard - created SECoP issues - moved everything else to "outdated" (kept for reference) Change-Id: I87d69d1846fc4ed55f1c78b22fd4650d8550152b Reviewed-on: https://forge.frm2.tum.de/review/16573 Reviewed-by: Enrico Faulhaber <enrico.faulhaber@frm2.tum.de> Tested-by: JenkinsCodeReview <bjoern_pedersen@frm2.tum.de>
28 lines
743 B
ReStructuredText
28 lines
743 B
ReStructuredText
SECoP Issue 1: About SECoP Issues
|
|
=================================
|
|
|
|
The idea behind SECoP Issues is to document properly what was proposed,
|
|
what was discussed, what was decided and why it was decided.
|
|
|
|
An issue might take different states:
|
|
|
|
proposed
|
|
--------
|
|
|
|
A proposal should contain the motivation. As long as nobody else
|
|
joins into a discussion, the state remains *proposed*
|
|
|
|
under discussion
|
|
----------------
|
|
|
|
This state is kept until there is a decision taken.
|
|
|
|
closed
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
After a decision the state is *closed*. The issue is not deleted,
|
|
even if the decision was to not follow further the proposal.
|
|
This is helpful if somebody later rises a similar issue.
|
|
However, it should be possible to reopen an issue, if new
|
|
arguments arise.
|