Markus Zolliker
8663501150
- created secop_v2017-09-14.rst, based on the GoogleDocs SECoP Preliminary V2016-11-30 (rc 2) - this Document is supposed to contain the full SECoP standard - created SECoP issues - moved everything else to "outdated" (kept for reference) Change-Id: I87d69d1846fc4ed55f1c78b22fd4650d8550152b Reviewed-on: https://forge.frm2.tum.de/review/16573 Reviewed-by: Enrico Faulhaber <enrico.faulhaber@frm2.tum.de> Tested-by: JenkinsCodeReview <bjoern_pedersen@frm2.tum.de>
785 B
785 B
SECoP Issue 2: Equipment ID in Describing Message (under discussion)
The equipment ID is a SEC node property, and it is therefore redundant to put it as the second item of the describe message.
However as the describe/describing message might be extended later, for example to get the description of single modules only, we should specify a fixed word for the second item of the describe message, for example the keyword "ALL" or "All".
At the meeting in Berlin (2017-05-30) this was discussed, but it was not yet decided the the keyword should be exactly. Until a final decision, SECoP clients should ignore the second item.
Opinions
We should use key keyword ALL (Markus Zolliker)