revision of SECoP documentation
- created secop_v2017-09-14.rst, based on the GoogleDocs SECoP Preliminary V2016-11-30 (rc 2) - this Document is supposed to contain the full SECoP standard - created SECoP issues - moved everything else to "outdated" (kept for reference) Change-Id: I87d69d1846fc4ed55f1c78b22fd4650d8550152b Reviewed-on: https://forge.frm2.tum.de/review/16573 Reviewed-by: Enrico Faulhaber <enrico.faulhaber@frm2.tum.de> Tested-by: JenkinsCodeReview <bjoern_pedersen@frm2.tum.de>
This commit is contained in:
34
doc/source/protocol/issue_5.rst
Normal file
34
doc/source/protocol/issue_5.rst
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
|
||||
SECoP Issue 5: Definition of the term 'Property' (under discussion)
|
||||
===================================================================
|
||||
|
||||
The definition as in SECoP V2016-11-30 draft is not very consistent.
|
||||
|
||||
As decriptive data we have:
|
||||
|
||||
- SEC node properties
|
||||
- module properties
|
||||
- parameters properties
|
||||
- command properties
|
||||
|
||||
Live data may be:
|
||||
- value
|
||||
- timestamp 't'
|
||||
- sigma 'e'
|
||||
|
||||
It is confusing to use the same term 'property' for live data and for
|
||||
descriptive data.
|
||||
|
||||
The section with the definition of properties has to be rewritten.
|
||||
|
||||
Opinions
|
||||
--------
|
||||
|
||||
Enrico proposed to name live data like timestamps and sigma 'qualifiers'.
|
||||
|
||||
Markus supports this. He would be happy also with an other term than
|
||||
'qualifiers', but definitely does not like the terms 'live properties' and
|
||||
'descriptive properties', as two different things share the same name.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Decision
|
||||
--------
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user