From c28520bea64313074df7af2670b5c501ab1ea50b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Johnson <anj@aps.anl.gov>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:49:01 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Adjust test 66 so it doesn't fail if the gcc optimizer result
 gives -1 but glibc returns +1.  Both are correct, gcc is following a newer
 standard.

---
 src/libCom/test/epicsCalcTest.cpp | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/libCom/test/epicsCalcTest.cpp b/src/libCom/test/epicsCalcTest.cpp
index 77a77079f..ddb78be4f 100644
--- a/src/libCom/test/epicsCalcTest.cpp
+++ b/src/libCom/test/epicsCalcTest.cpp
@@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ MAIN(epicsCalcTest)
     testCalc("finite(-Inf,1,2)", 0);
     testExpr(isinf(0));
     testExpr(isinf(Inf));
-    testExpr(isinf(-Inf));
+    testExpr(!!isinf(-Inf));    // Some GCCs return -1/0/+1 rather than 0/+1
     testExpr(isinf(NaN));
     testExpr(isnan(0));
     testExpr(isnan(Inf));