Fix spelling in comments
Should be non-functional, except for some error message strings.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -130,8 +130,8 @@ bool bhe::updatePeriod (
|
||||
guard.assertIdenticalMutex ( this->mutex );
|
||||
|
||||
//
|
||||
// this block is enetered if the beacon was created as a side effect of
|
||||
// creating a connection and so we dont yet know the first beacon time
|
||||
// this block is entered if the beacon was created as a side effect of
|
||||
// creating a connection and so we don't yet know the first beacon time
|
||||
// and sequence number
|
||||
//
|
||||
if ( this->timeStamp == epicsTime () ) {
|
||||
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ bool bhe::updatePeriod (
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// 1) detect beacon duplications due to redundant routes
|
||||
// 1) detect beacon duplication due to redundant routes
|
||||
// 2) detect lost beacons due to input queue overrun or damage
|
||||
if ( CA_V410 ( protocolRevision ) ) {
|
||||
unsigned beaconSeqAdvance;
|
||||
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ bool bhe::updatePeriod (
|
||||
|
||||
// throw out sequence numbers that jump forward by only a few numbers
|
||||
// (this situation is probably caused by a duplicate route
|
||||
// or a beacon due to input queue overun)
|
||||
// or a beacon due to input queue overrun)
|
||||
if ( beaconSeqAdvance > 1 && beaconSeqAdvance < 4 ) {
|
||||
logBeaconDiscard ( beaconSeqAdvance, currentTime );
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
@@ -244,8 +244,8 @@ bool bhe::updatePeriod (
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Is this an IOC seen because of an IOC reboot
|
||||
* (beacon come at a higher rate just after the
|
||||
* IOC reboots). Lower tolarance here because we
|
||||
* dont have to worry about lost beacons.
|
||||
* IOC reboots). Lower tolerance here because we
|
||||
* don't have to worry about lost beacons.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* It may be possible to get false triggers here
|
||||
* if the client is busy, but this does not cause
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user