Fix spelling in comments

Should be non-functional, except for some error message strings.
This commit is contained in:
Michael Davidsaver
2021-08-15 09:54:21 -07:00
parent 42d06d6a38
commit e34b6c5c0c
186 changed files with 419 additions and 419 deletions

View File

@@ -130,8 +130,8 @@ bool bhe::updatePeriod (
guard.assertIdenticalMutex ( this->mutex );
//
// this block is enetered if the beacon was created as a side effect of
// creating a connection and so we dont yet know the first beacon time
// this block is entered if the beacon was created as a side effect of
// creating a connection and so we don't yet know the first beacon time
// and sequence number
//
if ( this->timeStamp == epicsTime () ) {
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ bool bhe::updatePeriod (
return false;
}
// 1) detect beacon duplications due to redundant routes
// 1) detect beacon duplication due to redundant routes
// 2) detect lost beacons due to input queue overrun or damage
if ( CA_V410 ( protocolRevision ) ) {
unsigned beaconSeqAdvance;
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ bool bhe::updatePeriod (
// throw out sequence numbers that jump forward by only a few numbers
// (this situation is probably caused by a duplicate route
// or a beacon due to input queue overun)
// or a beacon due to input queue overrun)
if ( beaconSeqAdvance > 1 && beaconSeqAdvance < 4 ) {
logBeaconDiscard ( beaconSeqAdvance, currentTime );
return false;
@@ -244,8 +244,8 @@ bool bhe::updatePeriod (
/*
* Is this an IOC seen because of an IOC reboot
* (beacon come at a higher rate just after the
* IOC reboots). Lower tolarance here because we
* dont have to worry about lost beacons.
* IOC reboots). Lower tolerance here because we
* don't have to worry about lost beacons.
*
* It may be possible to get false triggers here
* if the client is busy, but this does not cause