From 6edad3a53cee2689b7b56c8cecc6dada5497fc0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kamil Sedlak Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 14:49:15 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Resubmit README.TXT file. --- run/README.TXT | 1202 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 1202 insertions(+) create mode 100644 run/README.TXT diff --git a/run/README.TXT b/run/README.TXT new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4fea35a --- /dev/null +++ b/run/README.TXT @@ -0,0 +1,1202 @@ +musr_X.root: +X= + +============================================================================================== +Microbeam - Alex & Elvezio, April 2012 + +260034 ... ideal parallel beam, middle collimator 1mm, sample collimator 0.1mm +260033 ... ideal parallel beam, middle collimator 10mm, sample collimator 1mm +260032 ... ideal parallel beam, middle collimator 1mm +260031 ... ideal parallel beam, middle collimator 10mm +260024 ... FOR075_microbeam.DAT, middle collimator 1mm, sample collimator 0.1mm +260023 ... FOR075_microbeam.DAT, middle collimator 10mm, sample collimator 1mm +260022 ... FOR075_microbeam.DAT, middle collimator 1mm +260021 ... FOR075_microbeam.DAT, middle collimator 10mm +260008-9 ... files for tuning the quadrupole triplets using the "optimize.py" python script +260001 ... first trial + +============================================================================================== +NEUTRON DETECTOR - Alexey, November 2011: +250001 - first tests for a neutron detector + +============================================================================================== +GPS + +5018? ... like 5013? but with the new (pyramidal) forward veto - a short one +5017? ... like 5013? but with the new (pyramidal) forward veto - a middle one +5016? ... like 5013? but with the new (pyramidal) forward veto - a long one +5013? ... like 50111 (but larger statistics) +5012? ... like 50110 (but larger statistics) +50111 ... like 50081 but after geometry bug corrected (new geometry) +50110 ... like 50089 but after geometry bug corrected (old geometry) + CORRECTED BUG IN THE GEOMETRY (FOUND BY ALEX AMATO) 1.2.2012 +50108 ... like 50102, old geometry +50107 ... like 50101, old geometry +50102 ... like 50101, 150G +50101 ... based on 50081 but with the longitudinal polarisatoin, 50G +50091-93 ... like 50071-73 but with Geant4.9.5 (13.1.2012) +50090 ... like 50081 but with the old geometry +50089 ... like 50081 but with the old geometry (repetition of the 50021 geometry) +50081-83 ... like 50061-63 but with Geant4.9.5 (13.1.2012) +50080 ... like 50081 but at 0 magnetic field +50071-73 ... like 50051-50053 but with the new GPS design from 9.12.2011 +50061-63 ... like 50021-50023 but with the new GPS design from 9.12.2011 +50051 ... like 50021 but more focused beam; some detectors have different numbers!!! +50023 ... like 50021 but B=0.5 T +50022 ... like 50021 but B=0.05 T +50021 ... old GPS geometry, wide beam, B=0.005 T +50001 ... GPS geometry + +============================================================================================== +GPD + +40171 ... like 40111, but with larger angular coverage by another 2 "backward" detectors. +40161,2 ... like 40121, but the collimator is thicker only in the insert region of 2x4cm. +40152 ... like 40111 but with collimator 2 shifted: -25cm -> -45cm +40151 ... like 40111 but with collimator 2 shifted: -25cm -> -35cm +40141-3 ... like 40111-3 but with both lead collimators thicker +40131-3 ... like 40111-3 but with collimator at 25cm made thicker +40127 ... like 40123 but with m-counter embedded inside another veto detector +40126 ... like 40123 but with a narrow active collimator (to apply it in anticoincidence with backw. counters) +40125 ... like 40123 but with smaller opening in active collimator +40124 ... like 40123 but with larger m-counter +40121-3 ... like 40111-3 but with collimator at 10cm made thicker (3cm -> 5cm) +40113 ... like 40111 but GPDcollimator removed and added scintillators 21 and 22 + Al plate made of scintillator (veto counter) + ... i.e. like 40106 (40093) +40112 ... like 40111 but with GPDcollimator made of Pb (instead of Cu) +40111 ... like 40063 but with Geant4.9.4 (9.2.2011), 8000000 events + +40106 ... like 40093 but with Geant4.9.4 (31.1.2011) less events than 40105 +40105 ... like 40093 but with Geant4.9.4 (28.1.2011) +40104 ... like 40103 but GPDcollimator made of Pb (instead of Cu) +40103 ... like 40101 but scintillators 21 and 22 removed and GPDcollimator returned back + -> i.e. this run should be very close to 40063 but with thicker GPDcollimator2 collim +40102 ... like 40101 but scintillators 21 and 22 removed (probably not very interesting run) +40101 ... like 40093 but with GPDcollimator2 made thicker (3cm -> 5cm) +40093 ... like 40063 but GPDcollimator removed and added scintillators 21 and 22 + Al plate made of scintillator (veto counter) +40082 ... like 40063 but GPDcollimator made of Pb +40081 ... like 40063 but thicker GPDcollimator +40061-2 ... SetLargestAcceptableStep=200, beam according to measurement + done by Alexander with the camera +40051-2 ... test runs without detector to see where the muons stop in sample plane +40041-5 ... significantly improved geometry +40033 ... 0.03T, vertexsigma 5mm, p=100.0 +- 3 MeV +40032 ... 0.03T, vertexsigma 5mm, p=100.0 +- 0 MeV +40031 ... OT, vertexsigma 5mm, p=100.0 +- 0 MeV +40030 ... OT, vertexsigma 0mm, p=100.0 +- 0 MeV +40001 ... initial GPD design +=============================================================================================== + +Dec 2011 tests of Hight Field + +31044 ... similar to 31035 but at B= 50 gauss +31043 ... similar to 31035 but at B=500 gauss +31042 ... similar to 31035 but at B= 50 gauss and without the second collimator "collimatorA2" +31041 ... similar to 31035 but at B=500 gauss and without the second collimator "collimatorA2" + +May 2011 tests of High Field + +31036 ... like 31035 but B=8.0T. +31035 ... 10M, B=0.5T, improved geometry (Ti windows, Kapton window, sample holder) +31006 ... large stat. simulation, B=8.0T +31005 ... large stat. simulation, B=0.5T +31004 ... large stat. simulation, B=50G +31003 ... large stat. simulation, B=0T. +31002 ... modified beam pipe; field rising from 0 to 10 T +31001 ... first tests to see the dependence of muon rate on field + + +=============================================================================================== +Dec 2010 test of High Field + + +30711-36 ... large statistics simulation like 30605 and other fields +306?? ... using 2 adjacent detector segments (more statistics than 304?? and a small bug in *.mac corrected) +30583 ... like 30582, but with the goulombRegion commented out +30582 ... like 30581, but with the test size of positron counters +30581 ... like 30580, but with the ALC fieldmap +30580 ... like 8805 +30512-3 ... using all 8 segments of detectors +304?? ... using 2 adjacent detector segments +30220-5 ... like 30200-5 but with longitudinal muon polarisation +30200-5 ... like 30100-5 but with TURTLE beam +30100-5 ... December 2009 test for the High Field instrument done in ALC area - point-like beam ; transverse spin polaris. +================================================================================================== +SPIN ROTATOR STUDY + +20810 ... like 20661 but after the bug correction +20809 ... like 20641 but after the bug correction +20808 ... like 20611 but after the bug correction +20807 ... like 20612 but after the bug correction +20806 ... like 20501 but after the bug correction +20805 ... like 20502 but after the bug correction +20804 ... like 20503 but after the bug correction +20803 ... like 20504 but after the bug correction +20802 ... like 20505 but after the bug correction +20801 ... like 20511 but after the bug correction +6.9.2010 - bug found and corrected in the field-map extrapolation of the electric and magnetic fields + for the spin-rotator (3DEOpera and 3D and symmetryType=1 or 2). + +20709 ... like 20708, but with R1IN and R1OU shifted, and beam starting just at spinrot entrance. +20708 ... like 20702, but without the windows +20707 ... like 20702, p=28.0 MeV/c. +20706 ... like 20702, p=27.8 MeV/c. +20705 ... like 20702, p=27.6 MeV/c. +20704 ... like 20702, p=27.2 MeV/c. +20703 ... like 20702, p=27.0 MeV/c. +20702 ... like 20701 but with parallel and monoenergetic beam (27.4 MeV/c) +20701 ... repetition of 20661 but with Geant 4.9.4.p02 (24.8.2011) + +20391-4...like 20361-4 but without muon decays +20381 ... like 20351 but without muon decays +20371 ... like 20321 but without muon decays +20361 ... like 20351 but with monoenergetic beam +20351 ... like 20321 but with the matched B and E fields according to the calculation (calculations for 27.4 MeV/c muons) +20331 ... like 20321 but with uniform B and E fields +20321 ... repetition of 20313 +20311-6 ... based on 20303 and 20211 using the newest TURTLE (from February 2010) +20303 ... like 20181 but using Geant4.9.3 with appropriately modified steering file +20302 ... repeating 20181 but (i.e. using Geant4.9.p02) +20301 ... like 20181 but using Geant4.9.3 +2023? ... like 20181 but using NEW VERSION OF TURTLE +2022? ... like 2021? but with the turtle file generated using NEW VERSION OF TURTLE +2021? ... like 2020? but with larger gap in between the magnets of the spin rotators +2020? ... like 20181 but with correction of "/gun/vertex 0 0 -12032 mm" and different "/gun/turtleInterpretAxes" +2019? ... like 2018? but vith v04 instead of b05c +2018? ... like 2013? but with a little bit larger e01 +2016? ... like 20131 but with varying QSE4 +2015? ... like 2013? but with /gun/turtleInterpretAxes x-y +2014? ... electrodes = e01, magnetic field = v04, Turtle = reggiani_Jan2010_z-12032, varying e01 +2013? ... electrodes = e01, magnetic field = b05c, Turtle = reggiani_Jan2010_z-12032, varying e01 +2012? ... electrodes = e01, magnetic field = b05c, Turtle = pie3_HiField_d05_x30_z-15111 +2011? ... electrodes = e01, magnetic field = v04, Turtle = pie3_HiField_d05_x30_z-15111 +20024 ... like 20023 but with y coordinate interpreted as -y +20023 ... like 20021 but with E and B fields negative +20022 ... like 20021 but with y coordinate interpreted as -y +20021 ... Spin Rotator study - using output from TURTLE generated just in front of the spin rotator + +================================================================================================== +HIGH FIELD +145?? ... like 144??, but all events saved and statistics only 1M. +144?? ... based on 14060; updated geometry according to the latest knowledge; 8+1 validation counters +143?? ... 28.3.2012 quick (dirthy) test with flow cryostat requested by Robert - using the 0.4 mm Cu shield +142?? ... 28.3.2012 quick (dirthy) test with flow cryostat requested by Robert - using the 1.0 mm Al shield +141?? ... like 140?? but with TURTLE with zero momentum bite +14020 ... like 14010 but smaller statistics and storing all events (not just the ones with hit). +14001 ... 15.3.2012; Geant 4.9.5; based on 12700 and 31043 +----- +13850-61 ... like 13750 but with the M-counter as in 12700 +13750-61 ... like 13550 but with the old beamline+old collimators (12250) shifted 9mm upstream. +13650-61 ... like 12250 (repetition to see whether I can reproduce 12250). +13550-61 ... like 13150 but with the modified M-counter region and the old beamline+old collimators (12250). +13450-61 ... like 12260 but with the beamline and collimators as in 12950. +13350-61 ... like 13250 but with both collimators as in 12260 (just on different place). +13250-61 ... like 13150 but with the old (first) collimator (as in 12260). +13150-61 ... like 12950 but using 400 mum M-counter (300 mum in previous runs) +13050-61 ... like 12950 but using 400 mum M-counter (300 mum in previous runs) - bug (M0 overlap) +12950-61 ... like 12700 but using smaller sample holder (diameter=3mm instead of 8mm) +12800-61 ... like 12700 but using larger sample (8mm diameter instead of 5mm diameter) +12700-61 ... NEW DR geometry (based on status of 26.8.2011) (geometry started from runs 12360+30711) +12400-61 ... like 12300 but with TURTLE with zero momentum bite +12300-61 ... based on 8800, but with the different magnet and Turtle files (flow cryostat) +12200-61 ... like 12100 but with Geant4.9.4.p02 +12199 ... like 12160 but with Geant4.9.4 (28.1.2011) +12149 ... like 12110 but with Geant4.9.4 (28.1.2011) +12000-11 ... like 10900-10911 but with Geant 4.9.3 and with a new Turtle file (FOR077_reggiani_Feb2010.dat) +11650-9 ... Geant 4.9.3 using Coulomb scattering for muons (16.3.2010) +11631-5 ... different parameters of the processes in Geant 4.9.3. Problem with generated nr of muons + due to a bad compilation on merlin00 (effects triggered/generated rate, should + not cause other problems) (15.3.2010) +116?? ... like 109?? but with Geant 4.9.3, however not modifying the processes (i.e. processes as in 4.9.2.p02 *.mac files) +115?? ... high statistics, old TURTLE Geant 4.9.3 +114?? ... like 109?? but with February TURTLE (new turtle executable) and Geant 4.9.3 and 12M of events +113?? ... like 109?? but with January TURTLE (new turtle executable) and Geant 4.9.3 +11210 ... like 11110 but with Geant 4.9.3 +111?? ... like 109?? but with the NEW TURTLE file from Davide using the NEW TURTLE executable +110?? ... like 109?? but with the newest Cryogenics magnet (from 30.11.2009) +109?? ... like 106?? but with the newest OI magnet (from 3.11.2009) +108?? ... like 106?? but with the longitudinal field (also OK for the pile-up background study) +107?? ... like 106?? but with the field rotation +106?? ... like 102??, but without any field rotation and using new TURTLE file from Davide (pie3_HiField_d05_x30.dat) +105?? ... like 104?? ... (generated beam) but without the rotation of the magnet +10420 ... like 10410 but with magnetic field made positive instead of negative. 10420 and 10410 are expected to be + identical, if difference found, would be very strange! +104?? ... like 102?? but with the generated beam (instead of Turtle) with tiltsigma and pitch. +10330-41 ... like 10310-11 but only 5mrad rotation +10310-11 ... like 10210 but with the different directions of the field map rotation (to find out "the worst case scenario") + (5mrad rotation) +102?? ... like 98?? but with the negative field map (to have the same field map sign as in the old OI map) +101?? ... repetition of 91?? +10017-10021 ... like 10007 - 10011 but with the field map rotated in oposit direction (should not change anything) +100?? ... like 97?? but with musrSim and field of the solenoid tilted by 5 mrad +99?? ... like 97?? but with musrSim and field of the solenoid tilted by 20 mrad +98?? ... like 97?? but with musrSim and field of the solenoid tilted by 10 mrad +97?? ... like 85?? but with the new magnet OI_082009 +96?? ... like 87?? but with musrSim and field of the solenoid tilted by 20 mrad +95?? ... like 87?? but with musrSim and field of the solenoid tilted by 10 mrad +94?? ... like 85?? but with musrSim and field of the solenoid tilted by 20 mrad +93?? ... like 85?? but with musrSim and field of the solenoid tilted by 40 mrad +92?? ... like 85?? but with musrSim and field of the solenoid tilted by 100 mrad +91?? ... like 85?? but with musrSim and field of the solenoid tilted by 10 mrad +90?? ... like 88?? but using the merged code (musrSim) +8900-11,50-61 ... design of Alexey's dilution cryostat +8800-11,50-61 ... like 7600 but with massiver collimators (small flow cryostat) + sample holder +8700-11,50-61 ... like 8000 but with massiver collimators (56 mm cryostat) +8600-11,50-61 ... like 84?? but with massiver collimators +8500-11,50-61 ... like 8333 = new suggestion from Robert + more massive collimators +8450-61 ... pileup for 8400_11 +8400-11 ... small dilution cryostat (new suggestion from Robert) but using the veto + veto plate a'la Elvezio +8350-61 ... pileup for 8300_11 +8300-11 ... small dilution cryostat (new suggestion from Robert) +8250-61 ... pileup for 8200_11 +8200-11 ... like 8100-10 but using Elvezio's idea of veto cylinder (no veto behind the sample!) +8150-61 ... pileup for 8100_11 +8100-11 ... like 8000-10 but for 48 mm dilution cryostat +8050-61 ... pileup for 8000_11 +8000-11 ... 56 mm dilution cryostat + small active collimator size + sample holder rod + 4 cryostat walls +7700-11 ... like 7600-11 but for pileup +7600-11 ... like 7500-11 but with small active collimator size +7590-96 ... different outer radius of the active collimator +7520-40 ... like 7500-11 but with fine step in magnetic field +7500-11 ... like 7400-11 but for the pile-up +7417 ... like 7405 but with the passive collimator made active (in order to investigate why so many muons stop + in the M0) +7400-11 ... similar to 7180-91 (old version of GEANT = 4.9.1.p03, but not with the changes by Gumplinger) with: + 1) Veto cylinder 2mm thick, with 0.5mm gap around wals, and veto + cylinder combined together + 2) 1 mm Al plate around M0 + 3) Larger windows in cryostat flanges, one of them changed from Ti to Mylar +7300-11 ... like 7180-91 but with new GEANT version 4.9.2 +7250-61 ... like 7221 (detector radius 50mm) but for fields between 0 and 10 T +7230-41 ... like 7222 (detector radius 60mm) but for fields between 0 and 10 T. +7220-02 ... like 7190 (at 9.99 T) but with larger inner detector radius (40, 50 and 60 mm) (+ modified Active Collim. to fit in pos. counters) +7200-11 ... like 7180-91 but with smaller m0 counter (3 mm instead of 6mm in diameter) +7198 ... Robert's independent test using unpolarised muons (to see that the asymmetry amplitude is zero) +7180-91 ... corrected 7160-71 but with an 8 mm gap between active collimator and the positron detector, + and only a half veto cylinder (forward half removed), and thinner veto (2mm instead of 2.4mm), + and larger m0 counter (6 mm instead of 3 mm in diameter) +7160-71 ... like 7140-50 but with the short cryostat, but with an conflict in geometry (veto cylinder goes through + cryostat window). +7140-50 ... like 6720-30 but with the flange on the cryostat 1 outside the cylinder +7120-30 ... like 6720-30 but with a box-like 10T field in the volume of 15x10cm around the sample (z=15cm, R=10cm). +7100-10 ... like 6720-30 but with JASTEC field map +70?? ... like 69?? but for the pileup background (no event reweighting, decay times -1 -1) +6900-90 ... like 6720-30 but for different magnets: 2420d, 2420e, alc_kamil_2D, worsened_A_OI_10T_grid_xz, ISIS +68?? ... like 67?? but for the pileup background (no event reweighting, decay times -1 -1) +6760-70 ... like 6720-30 but with FOR077_pie3_HiField_d02_x15.dat and correct distnace (1.3 meters) from the sample!!! +6740-50 ... like 6720-30 but with FOR077_pie3_HiField_d01_x15.dat and correct distnace (2.5 meters) from the sample!!! +6720-30 ... repeating 6020-30 with musr_Gumplinger_and_Apos executable + +6670,6690 ... like 6630 and 6650 but with no limit on muon decay time and all events saved (for the pile-up investigations) +6630,6650 ... like 6530 and 6550 but with new (longer) turtle files from Davide and without any event reweighting +6560, 61, 70 ... like 6540,41,50 but with larger TURTLE input file and musr_Gumplinger_and_Apos executable +6540-50 ... like 6020-30 but for the new turtle input file (focused beam) from Davide FOR077_pie3_HiField_d02_x15.dat +6520-30 ... like 6020-30 but for the new turtle input file (parallel beam) from Davide FOR077_pie3_HiField_d01_x15.dat +63?? ... for the pile-up background (shound not be done with event reweighting next time!) +... +... +6020-30 ... (2008.11. ) ... like 6000-10 but with additional cylindrical veto counter. +6000-10 ... (2008.11. ) ... cryostat with 30mm outer diameter, 3 walls +5900-10 ... (2008.11.05) ... like 5500-10 but with 60mm diameter detector (dilution-like cryostat). +5800-10 ... (2008.10.24) ... like 5500-10 but with the ISIS magnet +5700-10 ... (2008.10.24) ... like 5500-10 but with the ALC magnet +==== 2008.10.24 ====== +FOR070_2008_09_29_XXII.DAT: RMS of x_ini(z=-1.0m) = 35-40 mm; RMS of y_ini(z=-1.0m) = 27-30 mm; + boundary R=70mm; + p_ini = 27.74 +/- 0.72 MeV/c; p_min_allowed=25.2, p_max_allowed=29.8. +==== 2008.10.21 ==== change on Merlin00 - for some reason musr executable crashes now +5600-10 ... like 5500-10 but with the Cryogenics magnet +5540-50 ... (2008.11.05) like 5500-10 but with larger detector and cryostat (inner detector diameter = 40mm). + The size of veto counter is the same as in 5520-30, larger than in 5500-5510. +5520-30 ... like 5500-10 but with larger detector, cryostat and veto counter (inner detector diameter = 30mm) +5500-10 ... like 5370-80 but with FOR070_2008_09_29_XXII.DAT turtle file (broader momentum bite) +==== some changes in the code +5370-80 ... like 5350-60 but with FOR070_2008_09_29_XII.DAT turtle file +5350-60 ... 2 milion of events, 0-10T field, FOR070_2008_09_29_XI.DAT turgle file, OI magnet +5220-30 +5200-10 +5182 ... 3 milion of events with APDs at 0 T field +5181+3 ... 2 and 1 milion of events with APDs (for radiation studies) at 10 T +5170-80 +5161-2 ... for Alexey - test of the solid angle of the detector and APD's in 10T and 0T. +5150-60 ... like 5144 but with FOR070_2008_09_29_I.DAT turtle input file (focused to z=0 at B=0) and B from 0 to 10 T +5145 ... like 5181 but with 50cm long narrow-part beam-pipe and newly positioned conical collimators +5143 ... like 5181 but with 50cm long narrow-part beam-pipe +5142 ... like 5181 (should be exactly the same as 5181) +5141 ... like 5181 but with ALC-like beam pipe +====2008.09.29 ==== 1) implementing G4cons (for conical collimators) + 2) numberOfGeneratedEvents in G4PrimaryGeneratorAction (i.e. number of the generated events; + in case of Turtle nr. of events tried); +====2008.09.25 ==== just a minor change in program - typeOfProcess variable removed from musrParameters.cc and other routines + + steering file restructured +5139 ... ISIS high field magnet; +5132-6 ... like 5081 but with field homogeneity worsened 10 times around 10 Tesla; decay times aroud 0.4, 5.4, 10.4, 20.4 and 30.4 microseconds. +5131 ... like 5081 but with 16 detectors instead of 8. +5121-4 ... like 5081 but with sigma(p) of 0, 1, 2 and 4 %. (5081 = 3%) +5110-20 ... like 5083 (i.e. with the Robert's TURTLE input file) and field from 0 to 10 T in steps of 1T. +5081, 5091-6 ... repeated once again for the updated version of the program +====2008.09.18.=== + 1) Adding the possibility to store the muon polarisation and time + when first hit occurred in the detector called M0, M1 and M2. + It is done in a way very similar to "Target" detector. + 2) Nr. of really generated events and the run number is now + stored into the "geantParameters" vector. + 3) Definitively removed variables "globalTime" and "fieldValue" + from the root tree. +5100-7 ... like 5081, 5091-7 but with 2T field in the sample region instead of 10T (but 10T field around the sample) +replaced 5091-7 ... like 5081 but with the M0-sample distance of 40, 60, 80, 100, 120, 150, 200 mm (instead of 22 mm) +5085 ... like 5081 but with the 5 T field inside the sample (10 T outside) and M0-sample distance only 7mm (instead of 22mm). +5084 ... like 5081 but with the 5 T field inside the sample (10 T outside) +5083 ... like 5081 but with the Robert's TURTLE +5082 ... like 5081 but with my TURTLE +replaced 5081 ... similar to 5002 but with 2.4 mm thick veto detector and broather initial beam +=====2008.09.10==== Some further small improvements +5067 ... like 5061 but using Coulomb scattering in a G4Region for e+ and e- 8.54 11.51 +5066 ... like 5061 but with Vvv info commented out. 5.04 7.30 +5065 ... like 5061 but with goulombRegion commented out. 8.94 11.60 +5064 ... like 5062 but with the decay times around 100400 ns. 9.25 12.05 +5063 ... like 5061 but seting production cuts in G4Region 5.04 7.39 +5062 ... like 5061 but using Coulomb scattering in a G4Region for muons 9.27 11.82 +5061 ... should be very close to 5041.mac (after the modifications) 8.93 11.59 +=====2008.08.28==== Processes have to be defined in the steering file now. + G4Region implemented ==> Should allow to define coulomb scattering within G4Region + ==> Should allow to set the production cuts in a G4Region +5042-52 ... like 5031 but with the decay times around 20400 40400 60400 80400 100400 150400 200400 250400 300400 400400 500400 ns. +5041 ... like 5031 after the change of code (no difference between 5031 expected) +=====2008.08.20==== 1) Change in event reweighting ===> The criterium is where the muon decays (and not + through which volumes it penetrates) + 2) Cleaning of the musrStepingAction.cc code +5032-4 ... like 5031 but with the decay times around 1400, 10400 and 100400 ns. +5031 ... like 5002 but after the bug in G4DecayWithSpin was removed (2008.08.19) +=====2008.08.19==== Bug removed in G4DecayWithSpin causing that there was amplitude dumping as a function of time +5022 ... like 5002 but with 2.4 mm thick veto detector + +5020 ... 100k events, decay time fixed to 100405 ns, muons generated at rest inside sample. +5019 ... like 5009 but with the decay times around 100000400 ns +5018 ... like 5009 but with the decay times around 10000400 ns +5017 ... like 5016 but with no muon beam momentum smearing. +5016 ... test run like 5015 but with decay time fixed to 100405 ns. +5015 ... like 5009 but just for testing +5014 ... like 5002 but with M0 counter 200mu thick (instead of 400) +5013 ... like 5002 but with momentum bite 2 times smaller than in 5002 +5012 ... like 5002 but with the decay times around 1000400 ns +5010-11 ... like 5002 but with the distance between sample and M0 counter 7 and 12 mm (instead of 22 mm) +5007-9 ... like 5002, but with the decay times around 1400, 10400 and 100400 ns. +5006 ... like 5002, momentum bite of sigma 2 times larger than in 5002 +5005 ... like 5002, d=30mm +5004 ... like 5002, d=24mm +5003 ... like 5002, d=14mm +5002 ... like 5001 but high stat. d = 20mm +5001 ... based on 1351 but with thiner scintillator boxes (low statistics) + + + + +3200 ... (27.4.2010) like 3048 but with GEANT 4.9.3 (visualisation for the new publication) +3121 ... (5.10.2009) like 3120 but with only 25 mum thick sampleCellWindow (instead of 50 mum). +3120 ... (5.10.2009) like 3107 but with: 1) Reduced step lenght of muons to 0.01 mm + 2) Added M0 counter (300 mum of scintillator + 25 mum of Mylar) +3112 ... like 3111 but with parallel beam +3111 ... like 3106 but with additional Cu collimator (close to sample, opening of 15mm in diameter) +3108 ... like 3106 but without the cryostat (Alexey was interested what is the effect of cryostat on asymmetry) +3107 ... like 3100 with the Cu sample cell filled with water with TURTLE from Davide +3106 ... like 3100 with the Al sample cell filled with water with TURTLE from Davide +3105 ... like 3100 with the Cu sample plate with TURTLE from Davide +3103 ... like 3100 with the Cu sample cell filled with water +3102 ... like 3100 with the Al sample cell filled with water +3101 ... like 3100 with the Cu sample plate +3100 ... like 3027 but with the new ALC cryostat - drawings from Alexey. Test setup. (27.8.2009) +--- +3068 ... like 3048 but with the new ALC field map form Oleg Kiselev ALC_2D_analytical_oleg.dat +3067 ... like 3048 but with some variables commented out and with the mean momentum of 26MeV +3066 ... like 3048 but with some variables commented out and with the mean momentum of 27MeV +3065 ... like 3048 but with some variables commented out and with the momentum smearing of 3MeV +3060-2 ... like 3051 but 3.33333333xstatistics in each run +3055-9 ... like 3050 but 2xstatistics in each run +3052-4 ... like 3049 but 3.33333333xstatistics in each run +3049-51 ... like 3048 but with 3 different TURTLE input files +3048 ... (7.10.2009) like 3043, small step size also for kapton (not only for target) +3047 ... (9.9.2009) like 3044 but after implementing muTargetMomZ (and smaller statistics) +3046 ... like 3027 but with muon momentum of 26 MeV +3045 ... like 3027 but with muon momentum of 27 MeV +3044 ... like 3027 but with muon momentum smearing of 3 MeV +3043 ... like 3027 but with no shield-like volumes to allow for positron annihilation +--- +3042 ... like 3021 but with shifted sample by -2mm +3041 ... like 3021 but with shifted sample by +2mm +3040 ... like 3021 but with shifted ALC field by 5cm (centre of the field is at -5.02 cm) +3039 ... like 3021 but with sample thickness of 1.2 mm +3038 ... like 3021 but with shifted ALC field by 5cm (centre of the field is at +5.02 cm) +3037 ... should be (almost) identical 3021 +3036 ... like 3021 but with tilted ALC field by 0.3 deg +3035 ... like 3021 but with tilted ALC field by 1 deg +3034 ... like 2021 but with sample thickness only 0.8 mm +3033 ... like 2021 but with tilted ALC field by 4 deg +3032 ... like 2021 but with tilted sample by 4 deg +3031 ... like 2021 but with tilted sample by 1 deg +3028 ... like 3027 but with step limit in the sample holder of 0.01 mm (for muons and e+, e-) +3027 ... like 3021 but with step limit in the sample of 0.01 mm (for muons and e+, e-). +3026 ... like 3023 but with G4MuPairProduction & G4MuBremsstrahlung & G4MultipleScattering off +3025 ... like 3023 but with G4MuPairProduction & G4MuBremsstrahlung off +3024 ... like 3023 but with G4MuPairProduction off +3023 ... like 3021 but with monoenergetic muon beam +3022 ... like 3021 but with negative muons (mu-) - the difference in low energy treatment of e+ and e- !!! +3021 ... like 3001 but with sensitive target & all Root varibles stored & + field volume has ID number 98 (not 99 as target) & new version of musrSim (after implementing + negative muons). +3006 ... like 3002 but with negative muons (mu-) - the difference in low energy treatment of e+ and e- !!! +3005 ... like 3002 but with G4MuPairProduction & G4MuBremsstrahlung & G4MultipleScattering off +3004 ... like 3002 but with G4MuPairProduction & G4MuBremsstrahlung off +3003 ... like 3002 but with G4MuPairProduction off +3002 ... like 3001 but with fewer setps in field (less events), sensitive target & all Root varibles stored & + field volume has ID number 98 (not 99 as target) +3001 ... like 2511 but with musrSim (2009-05-27) +2921 ... (2008.10.28) like 2201 but after many many modifications in the program +=== 2008.10.28 ======================== +2901-05 ... like 2511 but with coulomb scattering in target (for both e+ and mu+) and 1/5 statistics + +2621-05 ... like 2601-05 but with TURTLE file ...*KAMIL*... +2601-05 ... mass production: like 2511 but with the TURTLE file FOR061_2008_04_22.DAT +2591-95 ... mass production: like 2511 but with the point-like beam (/gun/vertexsigma 0 0 0 mm) +2581-85 ... mass production: like 2511 but with the homogeneous beam (/gun/vertexsigma -20 -20 0 mm) +2571-75 ... mass production: like 2511 but with the 28+-3 MeV muon beam +2561-65 ... mass production: like 2511 but with the 26 MeV muon beam +2551-55 ... mass production: like 2511 but with the 27 MeV muon beam +2541-45 ... mass production: like 2511 but with the 3mm sample and 1mm Pb shield +2531-35 ... mass production: like 2511 but with the 3mm sample +2521-25 ... mass production: like 2511 but with the 1mm Pb shield +2511-15 ... mass production: basic distribution, similar to 2501 but with a tiny change in the sample holder +2504 ... like 2501 but with the 3mm sample and 1mm Pb shield +2503 ... like 2501 but with the 3mm sample +2502 ... like 2501 but with the 1mm Pb shield +2501 ... new default; like 2500 but with less variables stored +2500 ... like 2178 (but with the corrected GlobalField implementation): + p=28MeV; Kapton; det_particleID added; + new field from Toni; polarisation =95%; all variables stored + +2425 ... like 2422 but with the det_Vvv info added +2422 ... like 2421 but with the det_VrtxtrackID negative if the signal consist of more than just one track +2421 ... like 2178 but with some new variables of det_??? added + +2417 ... like 2181 but with 0.5 deg tilt in y +2416 ... like 2181 but with Al sample holder 4mm thick (instead of 2mm) + +2301-2305 ... like 2201-2205 but for the simple tube geometry mimiking the old ALC. +2221-2226 ... like 2211-2216 but with the Cu cryostat added in the gap between the sample and rod. +2216 ... like 2211 but moved by 120 mm outside +2215 ... like 2211 but moved by 100 mm outside +2214 ... like 2211 but moved by 80 mm outside +2213 ... like 2211 but moved by 60 mm outside +2212 ... like 2211 but moved by 40 mm outside +2211 ... like 2202 but with the Cu rod added (simulates the holder of the cryostat) +2205 ... like 2201; Sample = 7mm Cu +2204 ... like 2201; Sample = 5mm Cu +2203 ... like 2201; Sample = 3mm Cu +2202 ... like 2201; Sample = 2mm Cu +2201 ... simple tube geometry mimiking the new ALC, Alexey wanted for the paper; Sample = 1mm Cu + + +2195-7 ... like 2181 but with the initial beam shifted by 2, 5 and 10 mm in y coordinate +2194 ... like 2181 but with oposite polarisation (100%) +2193 ... like 2181 but with polarisation = 100% +2192 ... like 2181 but with the 3mm sample and 1mm Pb shield +2191 ... like 2181 but with the 3mm sample +2190 ... like 2181 but with the 1mm Pb shield +2189 ... like 2181 but with the sample moved by 1mm forwards +2188 ... like 2181 but with the sample moved by 1mm backwards +2187 ... like 2181 but with the TURTLE beam +2186 ... like 2181 but with the point-like beam +2185 ... like 2181 but with homogeneous beam +2184 ... like 2181 but with momentum width 3MeV +2183 ... like 2181 but with p=26MeV +2182 ... like 2181 but with p=27MeV +2181 ... new default; like 2178 but with less variables stored +2178 ... new default: like 2113 but p=28MeV; Kapton; det_particleID added; + new field from Toni; polarisation =95%; all variables stored +2177 ... like 2113 but with the random polarisation after removing bug from 2176 +2176 ... !! buggy !! like 2113 but with the random polarisation +2175 ... like 2113 but with the polarisation factor -100% +2174 ... like 2113 but with the oposit polarisation +2173 ... like 2113 but with the polarisation factor 0% +2172 ... like 2113 but with the polarisation factor 80% +2171 ... like 2113 but with the polarisation factor 95% +2162-8 ... like 2113 but with the muons generated just in front of the sample + at y = 0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 12.5 and 15 mm +2161 ... like 2113 but with the reuse of the calculated field values +2160 ... special file to calculate the mass of the ALC detector +2159 ... special file to study the effect of the kapton and Ti foils on the muon momentum +2158 ... like 2113 but with new ALC soleniod field map (calculated by Femlab (Tony)) with momentum of 26.00 MeV +2157 ... like 2113 but with new ALC soleniod field map (calculated by Femlab (Tony)) with momentum of 28.00 MeV +2156 ... like 2113 but with new ALC soleniod field map (calculated by Femlab (Tony)) with momentum of 29.79 MeV +2155 ... like 2113 but with quads (as found with Alexey) and parallel beam before quads. +2154 ... like 2113 but with TURTLE (by Kamil 90 cm before solenoid with momentum of 29.79MeV) +2153 ... like 2113 but with TURTLE (by Kamil 90 cm before solenoid) +2152 ... like 2113 but with TURTLE (by Robert 90 cm before solenoid) +2151 ... like 2113 but with the muon mean momentum of 28 MeV/c +2150 ... repete of 2113 (to test how long it runs) +2140-2146 like 2130-2136 but with oposite polarisation +2135 ... like 2130 but with cryostat of length=68mm. +2134 ... like 2130 but with cryostat of length=48mm. +2133 ... like 2130 but with cryostat of length=28mm. +2132 ... like 2130 but with cryostat of length=8mm. +2131 ... like 2130 but with cryostat of length=0mm. +2130 ... based on 2113 but sample holder removed (new ALC basic geometry to be compared with 2131-2135) +2128 ... like 2121 but with flat distributed beam in 20mm radius +2127 ... like 2121 but with just point-like beam +2126 ... like 2113 but with some more variables stored and with the beam offset and tilt that should compensate +2125 ... like 2113 but with some more variables stored and with the beam tilt +2124 ... like 2113 but with some more variables stored and with the beam offset +2123 ... like 2122 but with the oposite numbering of the scintillator detectors and reversed B field. +2122 ... like 2121 but with the oposite numbering of the scintillator detectors +2121 ... like 2116 but with some more variables stored +2111-2117 ... like 2101-2107 but with GEANT 4.9.1 and changes as in 2110 +2110 ... like 2100 but with muon decay into two channels (also the radiative one) +2100 ... like 2051 but with GEANT 4.9.1 +2101-2107 ... like 2091-2097, but after removing a small bug from ElementField +2097 ... new 3D field map ALC, globalfield, field in log_fieldvolume at 0.5, rotation 2 degree +2096 ... new 3D field map ALC, globalfield, field in log_fieldvolume at 0.5, rotation 1 degree +2095 ... new 3D field map ALC, globalfield, field in log_fieldvolume at 0.5, rotation 0.5 degree +2094 ... new 3D field map ALC, globalfield, field in log_fieldvolume at 0.5, rotation 0.25 degree +2093 ... new 3D field map ALC, globalfield, field in log_fieldvolume at 0.5 +2092 ... new 3D field map ALC, globalfield, field in log_target at 0.5 +2091 ... new 3D field map ALC, globalfield, field in log_target at 0.01 +2090 ... test with the new 3D field map ALC +2084 ... like 2051 but with the signalSeparationTime = 200ns +2083 ... like 2051 but with the signalSeparationTime = 100ns +2082 ... like 2051 but with the signalSeparationTime = 25ns +2081 ... like 2051 but with the signalSeparationTime = 10ns +2078 ... like 2051 but muons generated just in front of the target at point at y=12 +2076 ... like 2051 but muons generated just in front of the target at point at y=10 +2075 ... like 2051 but muons generated just in front of the target at point at y=8 +2074 ... like 2051 but muons generated just in front of the target at point at y=6 +2073 ... like 2051 but muons generated just in front of the target at point at y=4 +2072 ... like 2051 but muons generated just in front of the target at point at y=2 +2071 ... like 2051 but muons generated just in front of the target at point at y=0 +2070 ... like 2051 but muons generated just in front of the target (gaussian profile in x&y) +2065 ... Cryogenics, globalfield, field in log_fieldvolume at 0.5, rotation 2 degree +2064 ... Cryogenics, globalfield, field in log_fieldvolume at 0.5, rotation 1 degree +2063 ... Cryogenics, globalfield, field in log_fieldvolume at 0.5, rotation 0.5 degree +2062 ... Cryogenics, globalfield, field in log_fieldvolume at 0.5, rotation 0.25 degree +2061 ... Cryogenics, globalfield, field in log_fieldvolume at 0.5 +2060 ... Cryogenics, globalfield, field in log_target at 0.5 +2059 ... Cryogenics, globalfield, field in log_target at 0.01 +2058 ... link to 2051 +2057 ... repete of 2041 (just to be sure that I can reproduce the results of 2041) +2056 ... like 2021 but with the Cryogenics magnetic field +2055 ... like 2051 but with tilt in y of 0.5 degree +2054 ... like 2051 but with tilt in y of 0.25 degree +2053 ... like 2051 but with offset in y of 10 mm +2052 ... like 2051 but with offset in y of 5 mm +2051 ... like 2021 but with some unused variables commented out (to have smaller root output file) +2049 ... like 2021 but with the pitch 0.05 +2048 ... like 2046 but with the pitch 0.05 (should slightly overfocuse focuse at 0T) +2047 ... like 2021 but with the tilt and offset (offset should add to the tilt at 0T) +2046 ... like 2021 but with the tilt and offset (offset should compensate the tilt at 0T) +2045 ... like 2021 but with the setlargestacceptablestep to 5 mm (instead of 200) +2044 ... like 2041 but with the setlargestacceptablestep to 5 mm (instead of 200) +2043 ... like 2041 but using the global field instead of magnetic field applied to log_World +2042 ... like 2041 but using the global field instead of magnetic field applied to log_target +2041 ... like 2021 but with the OI magnetic field +2034-6 ... like 2026 but with beam pitch +2031-3 ... like 2021 but with beam pitch +2029 ... like 2021 but with the turtle input (new turtle generated for high field) +2028 ... like 2027 but with the reversed initial polarisation +2027 ... like 2021 but with the muons generated just in front of the sample +2026 ... like 2021 but with the M counter +2025 ... like 2021 but with no sample (investigation of background) +2024 ... like 2023 + 1mm shield of Pb in the forward detector. +2023 ... like 2021 but with 3mm Cu Sample +2022 ... like 2021 + 1mm shield of Pb in the forward detector. +2021 ... 1mm Cu Sample; similar to 2003, but collimators at other position, modified sample holder +2015 ... like 2003 but with the 5mm sample +2014 ... like 2003 but with the far-away colimator off-axis by 10 mm +2013 ... like 2003 but with the near colimator off-axis by 10 mm +2012 ... like 2003 but with the beam tilt of 1.5 deg (no pitch) +2011 ... like 2003 but with the beam tilt of 0.5 deg (no pitch) +2008-10 ... different offsets of the magnetic field: 1cm in x, +/-3 cm in z +2007 ... like 2004 but with beam pitch and tilt +2006 ... like 2004 but with beam pitch and tilt +2005 ... like 2004 but with beam ofset by 10 mm. +2004 ... like 2002 but with thin tube detector holder (should correspond to alc_07_0523.dat) +2003 ... like 2002 but with large tube detector holder +2002 ... like 2001 but with larger target +2001 ... first test steering for the ALC test in December 2007 (the same steering as in 605.mac) + +1400-1415 ... like 1371 but with large beampipe (larger than magnet allows, but the same as was in 1351) +1391 ... like 1371 (to have more statistics) ... 1371_1391 = 18*300000 events +1381 ... like 1371 but at B=0T +1371 ... like 1351 but with the split-coil Cryogenics field map (and narrower beampipe) +1361 ... like 1351 but at B=0T +1351 ... like 1339 but after some bugs removed; higher statistics; +1341 ... like 1338 but after some bugs removed +1339 ... like 1338 but with reweighting of events with muons in collimators +1338 ... active collimator with the segmented beam-pipe and with the TURTLE input file +1337 ... like 1336 but this time with event reweighting according to the collimator1 (reweighting by factor of 5) +1336 ... similer to 1335 but with broader beam and after modifying the simulation code to allow + us the event reweighting (however not used in this run) +1335 ... like 1332 but with the new version of the active collimator +1331-4 ... like 1321-4 but ??? +1321-4 ... like 1311-4 but after migrating from magnetic to electromagnetic field in the F04GlobalField class +1314 ... based on 1313 but with the latest TURTLE input file +1313 ... based on 1312 but without the old "active collimator" +1312 ... like 1311 but with the G4Beamline-like magnetic field +1311 ... like 1174 (repete on 4 March 2008, after long time) +( old: 1200-13... like 1100-16 but with Cryogenics magnet instead of the OI. ) +119? ... like 118? but with narrow beam +118? ... like 117? but with all events saved and Cu used in the active collimator instead of scintillator +117? ... With Coulomb scattering, Ti cryostat, active collimator and the following options + M0 counter M1 counter Cryostat Cu-wall + 1172 200 mu - - + 1173 200 mu - yes + 1174 400 mu - yes + 1175 200 mu 200 mu yes + 1176 400 mu 400 mu yes +116? ... like 114? but after removing the bug +115? ... without Coulomb scatt. to compare with 114? +114? ... with Coulomb scattering (but buggy) +1131-4 ... like 1100 but with different l (1131 without M0 counter) +1120-21... just for testing with fine field map inside the sample. +1100-16... like 1050-1059 but with geant version 4.9.0 and larger target, sample and wider beam +1050-9...like 1035, but with 2000000 of events and different decaytimelimits +1029 ... l=20mm; d=20mm; scint= 3.63x3.63x3.63; decaytimelimits = 400-420ns, wide beam +1028 ... l=20mm; d=15mm; scint= 2.9x2.9x2.9; decaytimelimits = 400-420ns, wide beam +1025 ... l=20mm; d=12.2mm; scint= 2.5x2.5x2.5; decaytimelimits = 400-420ns, wide beam +1022 ... l=20mm; d=12.2mm; scint= 2.5x2.5x2.5; decaytimelimits = 10400-10420ns, wide beam +1021 ... l=20mm; d=12.2mm; scint= 2.5x2.5x2.5; decaytimelimits = 100400-100420ns, wide beam +1003-9 ... like 183-9 but with decaytimelimits = 10400-10420ns +1002 ... l=5mm; d=12.2mm,decaytimelimits = 100400-100420ns, wide beam +1001 ... l=5mm; d=12.2mm,decaytimelimits = 10400-10420ns, wide beam +1000 ... like 1002 but with the homogenious beam (not the Gaussian one) +193-9 ... like 183-9 but with focused beam +183-9 ... like 173-9 but with SetLargestAcceptableStep=4 and decaytime between 400 and 420 ns +179 ... like 173, with: l=20mm; d=20mm; scint= 3.63x3.63x3.63 +178 ... like 173, with: l=20mm; d=15mm; scint= 2.9x2.9x2.9 +177 ... like 173, with: l=20mm; d=20mm; scint= 2.5x2.5x2.5 +176 ... like 173, with: l=20mm; d=15mm; scint= 2.5x2.5x2.5 +175 ... like 173, with: l=20mm; d=12.2mm +174 ... like 173, with: l=10mm; d=12.2mm +173 ... New simple HiFi geometry suggested on the meeting on 13th June (Alex, Robert, Dirk) + l=5mm (distance from centre to cryostat backward wall); + d=12.2mm (inner distance of opposite scintilators) +172 ... like 170 but with old 3D field map. +171 ... like 170 but all events stored +170 ... like 165 but after changing the way how initial polarisation is defined. +168,9 ... like 165,6 but with old 3D field map. +167 ... like 166 but smaller beam momentum smearing. +166 ... like 165 but at 10 T +165 ... like 156 but with O.I. field map (now field map is read in in polar coordinates) +161 ... like 156 but no magnetic field +160 ... like 156 but no beam momentum and generated position smearing +159 ... like 156 but no beam momentum smearing +158 ... like 156 but without cryostat +156,157 ... like 154 and 155 but with GEANT 4.8.3; corrected titanium windows in the cryostat; SetLargestAcceptableStep=20; +155 ... like 154 but with decaytime between 1400 and 1440 ns +154 ... tubsbox; otherwise like 152 +153 ... like 141 but with time info of the hits (signalSeparationTime=1ns) +152 ... like 141 but with time info of the hits (signalSeparationTime=0.1ns) +146 ... like 142 but now using G4CoulombScattering for muons +145 ... like 144 but with restricted beam width (sigma=2.5mm) +144 ... like 143 but without the magnetic field +143 ... like 142 but without the cryostats +142 ... like 141 but without beam smearing +141 ... HiFi with tubs; now with smaller range cut and beam size restricted to the beam +136 ... HiFi; TF=3T; (now with smaller range cut (was 1cm before, now 0.1mm and in target 0.01mm) + +701 ... like 314 (i.e. the test ALC geometry to our best knowledge) for the updated code/steering. + (to reproduce 314, sign of the polarisation had to be changed from 1 to -1) (planned for October 2007 seminar). +615-8 ... reversally polarised muons to 605-8 +605-8 ... like 602-4 but with all events (not only those with hits) (and plus 1.5 mm thickness) ; +602-4 ... new ALC with Cu sample of 1, 2 and 3 mm. +601 ... new ALC design with many details (test run) +561-6 ... like 543,544 but with changing the radius of the iron inner tube for the backward detector (not the forward!) + (R_Fe_back=30,40,45 mm) (+34mm for the runs 543,544). +551-8 ... like 543,544 but with changing the thickness of the iron inner tube for the backward detector (not the forward!) + (Fe_back_thickness=1,3,4,5 mm) (+2mm for the runs 543,544). +541-6 ... like 525&526 with the correct (inner) R_det=47 & 56 mm & different iron inner tubes of wall + thickness of 1,2 and 3 mm. +BUG IN SOME PREVIOUS RUNS: R_det was in fact not the inner radius but the radius in the middle of the scint. +531-538 ... like 521-530 but with l_target=3mm and l_det_backward=80,100,140,160mm (+runs 525&526 for 120mm). +521-530 ... segmented det; l_sep=2*2mm; l_det=120mm; Cu target; l_target= 1,2,3,4,5mm; + R_forw=47 mm; R_back=56 mm; different scintilator widths; added Fe tube 2mm; +511-520 ... like 501-510 but with the segmented detectors +501-510 ... l_sep=2*2mm; l_det=120mm; Cu target; l_target= 1,2,3,4,5mm; R_forw=42 mm; R_back=51 mm; added Fe tube 2mm; +491-500 ... l_sep=0; l_det=120mm; Cu target; l_target= 1,2,3,4,5mm; R_forw=45 mm; R_back=54 mm; added Fe tube 2mm; +481-484 ... like 445-6 but with added steel (2mm) or aluminium (4mm) tube +471-478 ... l_sep=0; l_det=150, 120, 100, 70 mm; Cu target; l_target= 3mm; R_det=47.5 mm + runs 449-450, 445-446 +461-464 ... l_sep=0; l_det=200mm; Cu target; l_target= 3mm; R_back= 47.5 mm; R_forw=42.5, 37.5 mm +451-458 ... l_sep=0; l_det=200mm; Cu target; l_target= 3mm; R_forw= 47.5 mm; R_back=52.5, 57.5, 62.5, 67.5 mm +449-450 ... l_sep=0; l_det=170mm; Cu target; l_target= 3mm; R_det=47.5 mm +441-446 ... l_sep=0; l_det=200mm; Cu target; l_target= 3mm; R_det=27.5, 37.5 & 47.5 mm +431-436 ... l_sep=2*20mm; R_det=27.5mm; l_det=50, 100, 150 mm; Cu target; l_target= 3mm; (+ RUN 425 & 426 for l_det=200mm) +421-428 ... l_sep=2*20mm; R_det=27.5mm; l_det=200mm; Cu target; l_target=0.5, 1, 3, 5 mm; +409-14 ... like 389 and 408 but with the separation of 2*10, 2*20 and 2*30mm. +408 ... like 389 but with reversed polarisation +405-6 ... like previous but with the separation of 2*30mm +403-4 ... like previous but with the separation of 2*20mm +401-2 ... like 382 and 393 but with the separation between detectors of 2*10mm +393 ... like 382 but with reversed polarisation (0,0,1) instead of (0,0,-1) +389-392 ... like 382,386-8 with adding 3mm Cu after the target +386-8 ... like 382 but with increasing R_of_the_backward_detector=27.5, 30, 32.5 and 35 +381-5 ... like 375-9 but NO COLLIMATOR ! +376-9 ... like 375, but with R_beam_max = 20, 22.5, 25 and 27mm; +375 ... sigma_beam=11mm; R_beam_max=15mm; collimators on +370-1 ... like 364-5 but with the point-like shifted by 27 mm on the x axis +368-9 ... like 364-5 but with the point-like shifted by 18 mm on the x axis +366-7 ... like 364-5 but with the point-like shifted by 9 mm on the x axis +364-5 ... big target, but just a point-like beam +362-3 ... like 358-9 but with beam limited to just r=14mm (like in 354-7) +360-1 ... like 358-9 but with only water target without brass +358-9 ... like 356-7 but with wider target and beam +354-7 ... like 350-3, but with 11mm sigma of the beam width +350-3 ... like 346-9, but with 5mm sigma of the beam width +348-9 ... like 346-7, but with 200mm long detectors +346-7 ... water target, 100mm long detectors, point-like beam; +344-5 ... like 332-3 but after the implementation of 2D field possibility (just to check all remains OK) +342-3 ... like 332-3 but with 2mm target with centre at 0mm +340-1 ... like 332-3 but with 2mm target with centre at 1mm +338-9 ... like 332-3 but with beam of spacial spread of generated muons with sigma = 11mm +330-7 ... like 322-9 but with corrected detector diameter to 55mm, no separation gap, point-like beam + and thinner Cu target. +322-9 ... Simple ALC-like design (just tubes) with the length of scintilators = 50, 100, 200 and 300 mm + (study for Alexey and Robert). +320-1 ... like 314-315 but with the target shifted by 10 mm towards the back detector +318-9 ... like 314-315 but with the forward detector shifted by 5 mm in x direction +314-7 ... like 310-3 but with time info of the hits +310-3 ... (NEW DEFINITION!!!) like 290-4 but with 2mm PVC added behind the target. +312-3 ... (REWRITTEN!!!) like 292-3 but with target thickness of 1 mm instead of 0.8 +310-1 ... (REWRITTEN!!!) like 290-1 but with Geant 4.8.3 - no change observed +304-9 ... like 290-1 but with G4CoulombScattering and just for 5 B-field values and 10000 events/fieldValue +300-3 ... like 290-3 but with G4CoulombScattering instead of G4MultipleScattering +292-3 ... Al target +290-1 ... like 260-1 but with solid aluminium tube in forward region added +278-83... like 268-73 but without target +274-5 ... repeated 260-1 +272-3 ... like 268-9 but with beam tilt of 0.2 and 0.5 degree +270-1 ... like 268-9 but with vertex shifted by 4 and 9 mm +268-9 ... like 260-1 but with TURTLE BEAM PROFILE +262-7 ... different runs (all?) without target +260-1 ... NEW DEFAULT like 234-5 but with much smaller range cut (was 1cm before, now 0.1mm and in target 0.01mm) +254-5 ... like 234-5 but with penelope processes +252-3 ... like 234-5 but with lowenergy processes +250-1 ... like 234-5 but with forward dectector shifted by 10 mm +240-1 ... like 234-5 but with very simplified geometry +238-9 ... like 234-5 but with random tilt with sigma of 0.5 degree +236-7 ... like 234-5 but with tilt in y of 0.5 degree +234-5 ... ALC; target = 2mm Cu; changed beam properties +232-3 ... like 222-3 but with the beamwidth of 1mm +230-1 ... like 222-3 but with the momentum smearing of 10% +228-9 ... like 222-3 but with target shifted by 2mm in the forward direction +226-7 ... like 222-3 but without target +224-5 ... like 222-3 but with Cu 2mm target; +222-3 ... ALC; target = 0.8mm Al; detailed geometry description +220, 221 like 210&211 but muon source shifted to ~-1m +218, 219 like 210&211 but without target +216, 217 like 210&211 but with target shifted by 2mm in forward direction +214, 215 like 210&211 but with Cu 2mm target +212, 213 like 210&211 but with 1mm beam width +211 ... ALC; target = Al; B=2.3-5T; only three modules +210 ... ALC; target = Al; B=0-2T; only three modules +208 ... like 205 but with target = Al +207 ... like 204 but with target = Al +206 ... like 204 but with almost no beam width +205 ... ALC; target=Cu; B=2.3-5T +204 ... ALC; target=Cu; B=0-2T +201 ... ALC; design + +116 ... like 110 but with the tube target (was box overlaping with detector region in 110) +115 ... 100k like 116 but with TF=3 Tesla; +114 ... 1M; tubsbox; TF=3 Tesla , emu20.dat, step=100mm; P=29MeV; cryostat included 31.049206h, 30.420839h +113 ... 1M; tubsbox; TF=3000 Gauss, emu20.dat, step=100mm; P=29MeV; cryostat included 2.5324222h, 2.4793444h +112 ... 1M; tubsbox; TF=3000 Gauss, uniform, step=200mm; P=29MeV; cryostat included 65.873625h, 64.539083h +111 ... 1M; tubsbox; TF=300 Gauss, uniform, step=200mm; P=29MeV; cryostat included; 0.97465h, 0.95433889h +110 ... 1M; small tube; TF=300 Gauss, uniform, step=200mm; P=29MeV; cryostat included; 1.1270083h, 1.0706889h +106 ... like 102 but putting in many more volumes +105 ... 1M; small tube; TF=3 Tesla from emu20.dat; P=29MeV; +104 ... 1M; small tube; TF=3000 Gauss from emu20.dat; P=29MeV; +103 ... 1M; small tube; TF=3000 Gauss; step=200mm; P=29MeV; +102 ... 1M; small tube; TF=300 Gauss; step=200mm; P=29MeV; + +1 ... Transverse field 30 Gauss; strange ratio of Forward/Backward - why + not 1? +2 ... Like 1 but two more variable added to the Root Tree. +3 ... Transverse field 10e-6 T. +16... 1M; No field; +17... 1M; TF=30 Gauss +18... 1M; TF=300 Gauss +19... 1M; TF=30 Gauss; Delta_P/P = 0.05; +20... 1M; LF=30 Gauss; Delta_P/P = 0. +21... 1M; LF=30 Gauss; P=1MeV and Delta_P/P=0.3 +22... 1M; TF=30 Gauss; P=1MeV and Delta_P/P=0.3 +23... like 17 (to retest version 17, because 22 seems to be buggy) +24... 0.1M; TF=30 Gauss; P=3MeV and Delta_P/P=0.05 +25... 1M; TF=300 Gauss; P=3MeV and Delta_P/P=0.05 +26... debugging +27... 1M; TF=300 Gauss; P=29MeV; Gaussian magnetic field with B_RMS=5mm +33... 0.1M; TF=300 Gaus; P=29MeV; Delta_P/P=0.5 (with down limit) +34... like 33 but changed way of reading the posIniMomX Y Z in the program +36... 1M; TF=30 Gauss; P=29MeV; finer range cut = 1mm (was 1cm before) +37... 1M; TF=300 Gauss; P=29MeV; +38... 1M; TF=300 Gauss; Gaussian field (sigma=10mm) +39... 1M; TF=300 Gauss; Gaussian field; P=29MeV; momentum smearing +40... 10M; like 37 +41... like 37 but with LF +42... like 38 but gaussian sigma = 5mm +43... like 38 but gaussian sigma = 8mm +44... 1M; P=29MeV; zero field +45... 1M; TF=300 Gauss; P=29MeV +46... 1M; TF=300 Gauss; P=29MeV; momentum smearing +48... 1M; TF=300 Gauss; P=3MeV; momentum smearing with sigma=1.5MeV, cutted +49... 100k like 45, however with new version of musr with the Geant4 muon decay with spin +51,53,54,55,58 ... like 4? but with the new version of musr with the Geant4 muon decay +70... 1M; TF=300 Gauss; P=29MeV +71... 1M; TF=300 Gauss; P=29MeV; tube geometry +72... 1M; TF=3000 Gauss; P=29MeV; delta P=0.05; tube geom; +73... 1M; TF=3000 Gauss; P=29MeV; delta P=0.5; tube geom; +74... like 71 but with separation gap of 10degrees between the scintilators. +75... 5M; like 73 +76... 5M; like 72, random seed initialisation = 2 +77... 1M; TF=0; P=29MeV; tube geom; random seed init=2 +78... like 71 but with GEANT 4.8.2.p01 (and random seed initialsation =2) +79... like 78 but with the removed classes "musrParticleGun.cc" and "musrParticleGunMessenger.cc" + (was maybe using old geant version ?) +80... 100k; TF=300 Gauss; P=29MeV; tube geometry; GEANT 4.8.2.p01; random seed initialisation = 2 +81... 100k; TF=300 Gauss; P=29MeV; tube geometry; GEANT 4.8.2.p01; random seed initialisation not set +82... like 80 but after change of the way how the random seed initialisation is done. +83... 10k; TF=3000 Gauss; P=29MeV; delta P=0.5; tube geom; GEANT 4.8.2.p01 +84... like 80 but with another change how the random seed is initialised +85... 1M; TF=300 Gauss; P=29MeV; tube geometry; GEANT 4.8.2.p01; randomOption = 2 (back to code of 82) +87... like 71 but with the new way how the geometry is read in; GEANT 4.8.2.p01 +88... test +90... like 71 but with the geometry read in from the steering file +91... like 90 but using "mm" instead of "cm" for the detector design (was wrong previously!!!) + - wrong thickness!!! Was 0.5mm, should be 5mm +92... correceted 91 (thickness of the scintilator 5mm) +98... like 71 but after merging the geometry_XX.txt file with the run_XX.mac file +99... like 92 ----------------------||------------------------------------------- +100... like 99 but with the magnetic field read in from the field map + + +130001 ... like 102202 (repetition) + +120072 ... like 120062 but without G4MultipleScattering, G4MuBremsstrahlung and G4MuPairProduction +12006? ... like 12004? but without SetUserLimits log_??? 0.01 +12005[2-4] ... (1.10.2009) like 12004[2-4] but without /musr/ignore SetUserLimits log_plate 0.01 +120049 ... (1.10.2009) like 120014 but with SetUserLimits log_??? 0.01 +12004[2-4] ... (30.9.2009) like 12003[2-4] but with momentum spread of the initial muons +120038 ... like 120032 but without SetUserLimits log_??? 0.01 +12003[2-4] ... like 12002[2-4] but with no initial momentum spred of the muons and with + /musr/ignore SetUserLimits log_plate 0.01, and with start of the Cu material at z=0mm. +120024 ... (24.9.2009) like 120022 but Cu sample divided into two pieces (the first is 0.04 mm thick) +120023 ... (24.9.2009) like 120022 but Cu sample divided into two pieces (the first is 0.02 mm thick) +120022 ... (24.9.2009) like 120016 but Cu sample a little bit thicker +120020 ... (18.9.2009) like 120016, but with kapton tape moved just in front of the Cu sample +120019 ... (18.9.2009) like 120018, but with Cu moved just in front of the Cu sample +120018 ... (18.9.2009) like 120016, but with Cu tape instaed of kapton +120017 ... (10.9.2009) like 120014, but no air and no kapton (i.e. only Cu sample plate) +120016 ... (10.9.2009) like 120014, but no air +120015 ... (10.9.2009) like 120014, but no kapton +120014 ... (10.9.2009) similar to previous, but with kapton tape and air (like in the real ALC experiment) +120010 ... (9.9.2009) test of the penetration depth in the ALC experiment (Cu sample plate) vs. SRIM +120000 ... test with the 76MeV muons stopping in GPD experiment (done for Rustem) + +====================================================================================== +10433? ... like 10432? but with 10% (?) momentum smearing of initial muons +10432? like 10431? but without the collimators +104315 ... like 104313 but with mu- +104311-4 ... experiment for David Taqqu with the preassure of 5, 20, 40, 60 mbar +10430? ... modified experiments for David Taqqu +10424? ... large stat, 500 V electric field (oposit to 10423?) +10423? ... large stat, 500 V electric field +104220 ... large statistics +104212 ... based on 104202 but with Geant4.9.5, larger stat. and an additional collimator +104211 ... based on 104201 but with Geant4.9.5, larger stat. and an additional collimator +104208 ... like 104202 but with Geant4.9.5 +104207 ... like 104201 but with Geant4.9.5 + +104202 ... like 104201 but with muons generated at rest in the volume of interest - to be + used for the detector efficiency calculations. +104201 ... real geometry as obtained from Aldo on 13.12.2011 + +104061 | 15MeV/c| 61 mum | +104062 | 15MeV/c| 62 mum | +104063 | 15MeV/c| 63 mum | +104064 | 15MeV/c| 64 mum | +104065 | 15MeV/c| 65 mum | +104066 | 15MeV/c| 66 mum | +104067 | 15MeV/c| 67 mum | + +104051 | 12MeV/c| 44 mum | +104052 | 12MeV/c| 45 mum | +104053 | 12MeV/c| 46 mum | +104054 | 12MeV/c| 47 mum | +104055 | 12MeV/c| 48 mum | +104056 | 12MeV/c| 49 mum | + +104041 | 10MeV/c| 19 mum | +104042 | 10MeV/c| 20 mum | +104043 | 10MeV/c| 21 mum | +104044 | 10MeV/c| 22 mum | + +104020 | No collim | 1M events +104021 | 70 mm brass | 1M events +104022 | 70 mm PVC | 1M events +104023 | 20 mm brass | 1M events + +104001 Experiment of Aldo (piE1 in October-November 2011): + +====================================================================================== +BEAMLINE OSCILLATIONS for Aldo: +103000: for Aldo ; beampipe for ALDO +103001: ALC magnet ; #piE3 TURTLE p=27.5#pm0.52MeV/c; measured (?) ALC field map +103002: ALC magnet ; #piE3 TURTLE p=10.0#pm0.19MeV/c; measured (?) ALC field map +103003: ALC magnet ; parallel beam p=10.0#pm0.30MeV/c; measured (?) ALC field map +103004: ALC magnet ; parallel beam p=10.0#pm0.30MeV/c; calculated ALC field map +103005: ALC magnet ; #piE3 TURTLE p=10.0#pm0.19MeV/c shifted; measured (?) ALC field map +103006: ALC magnet ; ideal focused beam, p=10.0#pm0.30MeV/c; measured (?) ALC field map +103007: ALC magnet ; prallel beam, p=10.0#pm0.30MeV/c; 25#mum scint.; measured (?) ALC field map +103008: ALC magnet ; prallel beam, p=10.0#pm0.30MeV/c; 29#mum scint.; measured (?) ALC field map + + + +====================================================================================== + +102303 ... like 102302 but with a newer Turtle file from Davide Reggiani +102302 ... like 102301 but with larger statistics +102301 ... (21.3.2012) based on 102202 but updated to the latest design. +---- +102202 ... like 102002 but using FOR070_2008_10_17_XXII.DAT turtle input file. +102102 ... (2008.10.20.) similar to 102002 but using FOR070_2008_10_17_XXII.DAT and including + new method to calculate the field integral along the muon path. +1020?? ... beam envelope using TURTLE input file "FOR070_2008_09_29_XII.DAT" + ... like FOR070_2008_09_29_II.DAT but with delta p/p ~ 3% instead of ~1.5% +1020?? ... beam envelope using TURTLE input file "FOR070_2008_09_29_XI.DAT" + ... like FOR070_2008_09_29_I.DAT but with delta p/p ~ 3% instead of ~1.5% +102002 ... beam envelope using TURTLE input file "FOR070_2008_09_29_II.DAT" + ... based on the initial Robert's turtle file, but focused + better to z=-20cm at zero field (to have a different + TURTLE file to see a possible influence of the Turtle files) +102001 ... beam envelope using TURTLE input file "FOR070_2008_09_29_I.DAT" + ... very similar to the initial Robert's turtle file, but focused + better to z=0 at zero field + + + +101061-2 ... like 101051-2 but for the 2m long beampipe (i.e. for the ALC design) +101053 ... like 101052 but with the better focuse to the centre of the solenoid +101052 ... like 101051 but 10 times more events +101051 ... like 101021 but with some more save volumes also before the quadrupole triplet +101033 ... like 101032 but with the r=15mm collimator at z=-10cm +101032 ... like 101031 but with the r=20mm collimator at z=-80cm +101031 ... real quads focused to -20cm, TURTLE 60 +101023 ... like 101022 but with the r=15mm collimator at z=-10cm +101022 ... like 101021 but with the r=20mm collimator at z=-80cm +101021 ... real quads focused to +10cm, TURTLE 60 +101019 ... like 101013 but with the restricted beam radius at the quadrupoles (should be directly comparable to 101014) +101018 ... real quads (as found out with Alexey) with field gradients adujsted to focuse parallel beam to the centre +101014 ... Turtle61 +101013 ... quadrupoles as in the TURTLE input file from Robert, the TURTLE output generated before the triplet (Turtle60) +101012 ... like 101011 but with the TURTLE beam before the quadrupole +101011 ... ALC with parallel beam before the quadrupoles, quadrupoles as measured with Alexey +101002 ... like 100392, but with the global field (implemented from F04 example from Gumplinger) +100411-24 ... like 100311-24 but for Cryogenics +100392 ... only "save" volumes, new TURTLE from Robert as is +100391 ... like 100387 but with less steps in the magnetic field +100390 ... only "save" volumes, gaussian parallel beam, tilt of the beam in y (corresponds to 5mm in the zero field) +100389 ... only "save" volumes, gaussian parallel beam, offset of the beam in y (5mm) +100388 ... only "save" volumes, gaussian parallel beam, smaller sigma in y than in x +100387 ... only "save" volumes, gaussian parallel beam +100386 ... only "save" volumes, focused beam +100385 ... only "save" volumes, TURTLE focused more or less to the centre. +100384 ... only "save" volumes, TURTLE as is +100381-3 ... using the new possibility of the "save" volumes +100331 +100321-9 ... like 100311-4 but with small radius of M0 counter and of the Sample +100319 ... OI magnet; FWHM(p)=3%; pitch such that beam focused 10cm after the sample at 0 field +100318 ... OI magnet; FWHM(p)=3%; pitch such that beam focused 50cm after the sample at 0 field +100317 ... OI magnet; FWHM(p)=3%; TURTLE input file; pitch +100316 ... OI magnet; FWHM(p)=3%; TURTLE input file; no pitch +100315 ... OI magnet; FWHM(p)=3%; pitch such that beam focused 20cm before the sample at 0 field +100314 ... OI magnet; FWHM(p)=3%; pitch such that beam focused 5cm before the sample at 0 field +100313 ... OI magnet; FWHM(p)=3%; pitch such that beam focused to the sample at 0 field +100312 ... OI magnet; FWHM(p)=8%; no pitch +100311 ... OI magnet; FWHM(p)=3%; no pitch +100301 ... like 100161 but with the beam focused at 0 Field to the centre of the sample, i.e. to (0,0,0). +100221-4 ... like 100121-4 but with momentum spread FWHM=8% +100171-4 ... M0 counter = 0.4 mm , momentum spread FWHM=3%; R=5, 10, 15 & 20 mm; l=20mm with Cryogenics magnet +100161 ... M0 counter = 0.4 mm , momentum spread FWHM=3%; Gaussian beam; l=20mm, +100151-4 ... M0 counter = 0.4 mm , momentum spread FWHM=3%; R=5, 10, 15 & 20 mm; l=5mm +100141-4 ... M0 counter = 0.4 mm , momentum spread FWHM=3%; R=5, 10, 15 & 20 mm; l=20mm +100131-4 ... M0 counter = 0.4 mm , no momentum spread, R=5, 10, 15 & 20 mm; l=20mm +100121-4 ... no M0 counter, momentum spread FWHM=3%; R=5, 10, 15 & 20 mm; l=20mm +100111-4 ... no M0 counter, no momentum spread, R=5, 10, 15 & 20 mm; l=20mm +100101-2 ... 0.4 mm M0 counter, momentum spread, R=10&20mm; l=20mm +100002 ... like 100001 but muons start at -50cm. +100001 ... muon beam properties in the target: OI magnet, muons start at z =~ -130cm. + +------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- +24613? ... like 24605 but for thinner scintillator bar +24610-2? ... like 24607?-9? but for the scintillator BC418 +24607-9? ... like 24604?-6? but for attenuation length of 80 mm +24606? ... like 24603?, SPTR=230; tau1=0.35; tau2=1.6 +24605? ... like 24603?, SPTR=120; tau1=0.35; tau2=1.6 +24604? ... like 24603?, SPTR= 0; tau1=0.35; tau2=1.6 +24603? ... study on the long scintillator bar: SPTR=0; tau1=0; tau2=0 + +2455?? ... like 2448?? but with 60x40 APD cells +2454?? ... like 2448?? but with just 1 APD cell +2453?? ... like 2448?? but with 6x4 APD cells +2452?? ... like 2447?? but with just 1 APD cell +2451?? ... like 2447?? but with 6x4 APD cells +2450?? ... like 2443?? but with even small detector (1000 x smaller than normal size). +2448?? ... like 2424?? but with 100% reflectivity +2447?? ... like 2437?? but with 100% reflectivity +2446?? ... like 2436?? but with 100% reflectivity +2445?? ... like 2435?? but with 100% reflectivity +2444?? ... like 2434?? but with 100% reflectivity +2443?? ... like 2442?? but with extremely small detector +2442?? ... like 2434?? but with rise times of 0 +2441?? ... based on 2434?? for rise times of 0, 0.063, 0.35, 1.0 + and decay times of 1, 1.32, 1.6, 5., 15 and 43.8 +2440?? ... like 2422 but with the random time jitter of 120 ps +243941 ... like 243841 but for LaBr3 +243841 ... like 243810 but with the RESOLUTIONSCALE=2.5 (to have amplitude smearing + for the comparison with Seifert) +243[8-9] ... like 2427?? and 2428?? but random time jitter of 120 ps +243[4-7] ... like 2420 2423 2424 2425 but random time jitter of 120 ps +243[0-3] ... like 2420 2423 2424 2425 but with rise/decay times of 0.063 and 1.32 +2428?? ... like 2424??, but for LaBr3 scintillator (Seifert) +2427?? ... like 2424??, but for LYSO scintillator (Seifert) +2426?? ... like 2422 but with the shorter rise and decay times +2425?? ... 2424?? + 2400 APD cells +2424?? ... 2423?? + random time jitter of 230 ps (i.e. should replace previous 224950) +2423?? ... 2420?? + cross talk of 0.11 (i.e. should replace previous 224900) +2422?? ... based on 2218?? - i.e. experimental setup modified according to 2420??, higher light yield +2421?? ... based on 2218?? - i.e. experimental setup modified according to 2420?? +2420?? ... based on 2248?? but with GEANT 4.9.5 (10.1.2012) run on Merlin4, + rise/decay times of 0.35 and 1.6 respectively, and CFD delay of 1.5 ns. +------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- +230001-5 ... test for Alexey: muons passing through scintillator of different thicknesses +------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +2256?? ... like 2248?? but run on Merlin4 (9.1.2012) +2251??- ... like 2249?? + finite nr. of cells effect (60x60 cells) +225001- ... like 224801 + finite nr. of cells effect (6x6 cells) +224901- ... like 224801 + cross talk +224801- ... repetition of 223301 after modifications of the code + --------- end of October 2011: Changes in the programm (cross-talk added, cell jitter changed) + +224201-62 ... like 2239?? but with the finite nr. of cells effect (1x1 cells) +224101-62 ... like 2239?? but with the finite nr. of cells effect (6x6 cells) +224001-62 ... like 2239?? but with the finite nr. of cells effect (60x60 cells) +223901-62 ... wide electron beam covering the full scintillator area +223301-862 ... like the previous runs, but after correcting the "dielectric_LUT" bug. + ... statistics increased. +MISTAKE in the previous runs - surface of the scintillator was wrongly defined + ("dielectric_dielectric" instead of "dielectric_LUT") +222801-62 ... like 222801-62 but with statistical fluctuations for photon creation +222701-62 ... like 222301-62 but with statistical fluctuations for ionis. losses +222601-62 ... like 222301-62 but rise time=0.35, decay time=1.32. +222501-62 ... like 222301-62 but rise time=0., decay time=1.32. +222401-62 ... like 222301-62 but rise time=0.35, decay time=1.6. +222351-62 ... like 222301-12 but sigma(APD)=100ps. +222301-12 ... light transport in a single counter; ionisation losses and photon creation + without statistical fluctuations. + Rise time=0.063, decay time=1.32, sigma(APD)=0ps. + +222021-2 +222001 ... simplified simulation of 221131, where there is just one counter, and + 2 MeV electron is generated at its entrance. + +------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +221951-67 ... like 221921-37 but with a different APD responce function + (APDpulseShapeFile_2011_Fitted.txt) +221921-37 ... like 221801 but with CFD information +221801 ... 4.11.2011 - based on 225101 and 221701 +221401 ....13.10.2011 - based on 223901 and 221131 + +221301 ... like 221131 but smaller statistic and without plastic holders +221211 ... like 221131 but smaller statistic and scint rise time = 1.0ns +221201 ... like 221131 but smaller statistic and scint rise time = 0.75ns +221191 ... like 221131 but smaller statistic and scint rise time = 0.5ns +221181 ... like 221131 but smaller statistic and scint rise time = 0.35ns +221171 ... like 221131 but smaller statistic and scint rise time = 0.2ns +221161 ... like 221131 but smaller statistic and scint rise time = 0.1ns +221151 ... like 221131 but smaller statistic and scint rise time = 0.03ns +221141 ... like 221131 but smaller statistic and scint rise time = 0.0ns + +221134 ... like 221131 but using 0.1 ps of random time scattering (instead of 100ps) +221133 ... like 221131 but using APDpulseShapeFile_2011_1e_H.txt +221132 ... like 221131 but delay time back to 1.5 ns +221131 ... like 221101_8 but after implementing CFD array & delay time=0.5 ns + +221123 ... like 221101-8 but using CFD delay of 0.8 ns +221122 ... like 221101-8 but using CFD delay of 0.7 ns +221121 ... like 221101-8 but using CFD delay of 0.6 ns +221120 ... like 221101-8 but using CFD delay of 0.4 ns +221119 ... like 221101-8 but using CFD delay of 0.3 ns + +221118 ... like 221101-8 but using CFD delay of 4.0 ns +221117 ... like 221101-8 but using CFD delay of 3.0 ns +221116 ... like 221101-8 but using CFD delay of 2.0 ns +221115 ... like 221101-8 but using CFD delay of 1.0 ns +221114 ... like 221101-8 but using CFD delay of 0.5 ns +221113 ... like 221101-8 but using CFD delay of 0.2 ns +221112 ... like 221101-8 but using APDpulseShapeFile_2011_1e_H.txt (steeper pulse rise) +221111 ... like 221101-8 but using 0.1 ps of random time scattering (instead of 100ps) +221101-8 ... new big simulation using APDpulseShapeFile_2011_1e_Z.txt +221086 ... like 221084 but after a change of stacking order for optical photons. +221083,84 ... with a newer APD response function +221061-4 ... like 221051-4 but after changing the CFD signal shaping and introducing some other + ... definitions of odet_timeC and odet_timeD. +221051-4 ... implementing also rise time of the photons in the scintillator, but there were some bugs. +221041-4 ... like 221032 but after correcting bug in mean time + different random option in some runs +221033 ... like 221032 but APD readout from both sides +221032 ... like 221031 but /musr/command OPSA CFD -0.2 1.5 -1.8 +221031 ... like 221011 but /musr/command OPSA CFD -0.3 2. -1.8 + plastic holders, huge statistics + +221014 ... like 221011 but /musr/command OPSA CFD -0.3 0.5 -1.8 +221013 ... like 221011 but /musr/command OPSA CFD -0.1 2. -1.8 +221012 ... like 221011 but /musr/command OPSA CFD -0.2 2. -1.8 +221011 ... like 104 (i.e. Sr source, C1 and C2 positron counters) including optical photons + ... /musr/command OPSA CFD -0.3 2. -1.8 +221000 ... again some Sr Tests, after long time. Now with Geant 4.9.4. (Feb 2011). + +220051-9 ... different fields +220001 ... muSR time asymmetry measurement in the ALC magent - test for Alexey + +210013 ... TOF measurement of the G-APDs in the ALC magnet using C1 and C2 positron counters; electrons as beam; B=4.8T - Coulomb sc. +210012 ... TOF measurement of the G-APDs in the ALC magnet using C1 and C2 positron counters; electrons as beam; B=0T +210011 ... TOF measurement of the G-APDs in the ALC magnet using C1 and C2 positron counters; electrons as beam; B=4.8T +210002 ... TOF measurement of the G-APDs in the ALC magnet using C1 and C2 muon counters; muons as beam; B=0T +210001 ... TOF measurement of the G-APDs in the ALC magnet using C1 and C2 muon counters; muons as beam; B=4.8T + +200037 ... Sr test with just C1 and C2 of the size 3x3x2mm +200031-35 ... Sr test with just C1 and C2 of the size 4x4.6x2 mm +200021 ... muons stopped in the centre of the sphere; C1=5mm, C3=20mm +200019 ... like 200013 but with only C1 and C2 (to test new idea of Alexey) +200018 ... Sr experiment with C1 and C2 moved very close to C3 +200013-7... Sr experiment in the set-up as in the case of the Alexey's experiment (C1=2mm, C2=2mm, C3=60mm) +200011 ... Strontium source emiting beta electrons towards the sphere detectors (C1=2mm, C2=2mm, C3=20mm) +200008 ... like 200007, but with 5 MeV positrons as a source +200007 ... like 200004, but with 30 MeV positrons as a source +200006 ... Strontium source emiting beta electrons towards the sphere detectors (the first one is 0.2 mm thick + 0.3mm Cu) +200005 ... Strontium source emiting beta electrons towards the sphere detectors (the first one is 0.2 mm thick) +200004 ... Strontium source emiting beta electrons towards the sphere detectors (the first one is 5 mm thick) +200003 ... Strontium source emiting beta electrons towards the sphere detectors (the first one is 2 mm thick) + + +PICTURES: + +HiFi_01.eps: - longitudinal cross-section through the HiFi detector. + visual.mac with +/vis/viewer/zoom 20 +/vis/viewer/set/sectionPlane on 0 0 0 cm -1 0 0 + and setting z coordinate to 15 (mm?) + + +Field Integral for OI for Robert (mean value =1.45 Tm): +root [1] TFile* f=new TFile("data/musr_102151.root") +root [2] t1->Draw("BzIntegral","(BzIntegral>-2)&&(muDecayDetID==1201)") +