These were previously left intact, even when exiting gracefully. As the
daemon also fails if the socket already exists, it became the caller's
responsibilityto check for and cleanup old socket files when performing
graceful / deliberate restarts.
Signed-off-by: Emily Shepherd <emily@redcoat.dev>
Leverages the Linux dummy interface type to create network interfaces
that permists routing packets through the Linux kernel without
them being transmitted.
This solution allows use of arbitrary non-loopback IP addresses within
the container.
Related to #466
Signed-off-by: Mircea Iordache-Sica <mircea@arista.com>
Currently, hostname is set in the original DHCPREQUEST but not the
renewal. With some DHCP server implementations (such as FreeBSD dhcpd),
this leads to the hostname being cleared in the lease table.
This behavior is inconsistent with other DHCP clients such as dhclient
which set the hostname on the renewal request as well. To fix, use the
same options for acquire and renew.
This is compatible with RFC 2131 (see table 5).
Signed-off-by: Akhil Velagapudi <4@4khil.com>
Previously, the bridge plugin ignored DNS settings returned
from an IPAM plugin (e.g. the host-local plugin parsing
resolv.conf to configure DNS). With this change, the bridge plugin
uses IPAM DNS settings.
Similarly to #388, this change will use incoming DNS settings if set,
otherwise IPAM plugin returned DNS settings
Signed-off-by: Kern Walster <walster@amazon.com>
This PR bring V2 API support into win-overlay CNI. With the current V1
API, only docker runtime works for win-overlay. By bringing new changes, we
should be able to use containerd as the runtime.Below are the key
points regarding this implementation.
1. Clear seperation for V1 & V2 API support
2. New cni.conf sample that works for win-overlay
Signed-off-by: selansen <esiva@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: mansikulkarni96 <mankulka@redhat.com>
The client id was constructed differently in the acquire
function compared to the release and renew functions,
which caused the dhcp-server to consider it a different client.
This is now encapsulated in a common function.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Wiesel <fabian.wiesel@sap.com>
checkPorts would return nil rather than an error if the per-container
DNAT chain didn't exist, meaning CHECK would erroneously return
success rather than failure.
chain.check() already (correctly) checks that the chain exists, so
there's no need to do it separately before calling that anyway.
Signed-off-by: Dan Winship <danwinship@redhat.com>
Calling AddPort before AddProtocol returns an error, which means ConntrackDeleteFilter has been called without port filter.
Signed-off-by: Sang Heon Lee <developistBV@gmail.com>
This commit adds a new parameter `ingressPolicy` (`string`) to the `firewall` plugin.
The supported values are `open` and `same-bridge`.
- `open` is the default and does NOP.
- `same-bridge` creates "CNI-ISOLATION-STAGE-1" and "CNI-ISOLATION-STAGE-2"
that are similar to Docker libnetwork's "DOCKER-ISOLATION-STAGE-1" and
"DOCKER-ISOLATION-STAGE-2" rules.
e.g., when `ns1` and `ns2` are connected to bridge `cni1`, and `ns3` is
connected to bridge `cni2`, the `same-bridge` ingress policy disallows
communications between `ns1` and `ns3`, while allowing communications
between `ns1` and `ns2`.
Please refer to the comment lines in `ingresspolicy.go` for the actual iptables rules.
The `same-bridge` ingress policy is expected to be used in conjunction
with `bridge` plugin. May not work as expected with other "main" plugins.
It should be also noted that the `same-bridge` ingress policy executes
raw `iptables` commands directly, even when the `backend` is set to `firewalld`.
We could potentially use the "direct" API of firewalld [1] to execute
iptables via firewalld, but it doesn't seem to have a clear benefit over just directly
executing raw iptables commands.
(Anyway, we have been already executing raw iptables commands in the `portmap` plugin)
[1] https://firewalld.org/documentation/direct/options.html
This commit replaces the `isolation` plugin proposal (issue 573, PR 574).
The design of `ingressPolicy` was discussed in the comments of the withdrawn PR 574 ,
but `same-network` was renamed to `same-bridge` then.
Signed-off-by: Akihiro Suda <akihiro.suda.cz@hco.ntt.co.jp>
