I think we should add the SSH fingerprints to the user docs, within the pages for accessing the interactive nodes.
Something like:
SSH security strongly relies on the machine you are connecting being trustworth. This is achieved by using special Host Keys, which are present to the SSH client. The user is normally prompted (when connecting for the first time) to verify that the Host Keys match up with what is expected on the server. In this way the user can know that they are connecting to a secured machine. For the Merlin7 login nodes, the SSH host key fingerprints are:
If the fingerprints are not the same as above, DO NOT confirm their validate and DO NOT enter your password! Please report the issue either via ServiceNow or directly via the Admin mailing list.
What do you guys think?
I think we should add the SSH fingerprints to the user docs, within the pages for accessing the interactive nodes.
Something like:
> SSH security strongly relies on the machine you are connecting being trustworth. This is achieved by using special Host Keys, which are present to the SSH client. The user is normally prompted (when connecting for the first time) to verify that the Host Keys match up with what is expected on the server. In this way the user can know that they are connecting to a secured machine. For the Merlin7 login nodes, the SSH host key fingerprints are:
>
> ```
> 256 SHA256:JIRPllRmLDIRcufAQ5qrDCciGyaz/scj5vA0s9yzB48 login001.merlin7.psi.ch (ED25519)
> 256 SHA256:nnP4IeemgKFGEVQd0WF2k7bpwQ+Xcy+XlK5iz6LZz1U login002.merlin7.psi.ch (ED25519)
> ```
>
> If the fingerprints are not the same as above, DO NOT confirm their validate and DO NOT enter your password! Please report the issue either via ServiceNow or directly via the Admin mailing list.
What do you guys think?
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
I think we should add the SSH fingerprints to the user docs, within the pages for accessing the interactive nodes.
Something like:
What do you guys think?
@viessm_h looks good to me! You have a typo here: