lemke_handClaude Sonnet 5
243aeeb962
test_channel_lists.py: test_compare_reports_missing_and_exceeding asserted set(result) == set(CHANNEL_LIST_CHANNELTYPES) (expecting channels_BS/ channels_BSCAM present) right next to asserting those same two keys are *not* in result -- self-contradictory. compare_channel_lists() only ever reports a list name that was actually present in `recorded`, matching the module's own docstring; fixed the assertion to match. test_cameras_swissfel.py: test_camera_basler_viewer_separate_process_passes_ name_and_cam_class called CameraBasler._widget_viewer as an unbound method against a bare fake `self` that didn't carry _CAM_CLASS_PATH, so getattr(self, "_CAM_CLASS_PATH", None) read None instead of the real class's value. Added _CAM_CLASS_PATH to the fake to match what a real CameraBasler instance would have. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
66 lines
2.5 KiB
Python
66 lines
2.5 KiB
Python
"""eco.aliases.channel_lists - the diff logic shared by
|
|
Daq.compare_channels() (local namespace) and the status server's
|
|
/channels/compare endpoint (see eco.status_server.namespace_store /
|
|
namespace_server, and tests/test_daq_status_server.py /
|
|
tests/test_status_server.py for the two integration paths)."""
|
|
|
|
from eco.aliases.channel_lists import (
|
|
compare_channel_lists,
|
|
required_channels_by_type,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_required_channels_by_type_groups_by_channeltype():
|
|
alias_list = [
|
|
{"alias": "jf03", "channel": "JF03", "channeltype": "JF"},
|
|
{"alias": "jf04", "channel": "JF04", "channeltype": "JF"},
|
|
{"alias": "bs1", "channel": "BS:1", "channeltype": "BS"},
|
|
{"alias": "pv1", "channel": "PV:1", "channeltype": "CA"},
|
|
]
|
|
grouped = required_channels_by_type(alias_list)
|
|
assert grouped["JF"] == ["JF03", "JF04"]
|
|
assert grouped["BS"] == ["BS:1"]
|
|
assert grouped["CA"] == ["PV:1"]
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_compare_reports_missing_and_exceeding():
|
|
alias_list = [
|
|
{"alias": "jf03", "channel": "JF03", "channeltype": "JF"},
|
|
{"alias": "jf04", "channel": "JF04", "channeltype": "JF"},
|
|
]
|
|
recorded = {"channels_JF": ["JF03", "JF_OLD"]}
|
|
result = compare_channel_lists(alias_list, recorded)
|
|
assert set(result) == {"channels_JF"} # only lists present in `recorded`
|
|
jf = result["channels_JF"]
|
|
assert jf["channeltype"] == "JF"
|
|
assert jf["missing"] == ["JF04"]
|
|
assert jf["exceeding"] == ["JF_OLD"]
|
|
assert jf["n_required"] == 2
|
|
assert jf["n_recorded"] == 2
|
|
# channels_BS/channels_BSCAM were not in `recorded` at all - not
|
|
# fabricated as "everything missing"
|
|
assert "channels_BS" not in result
|
|
assert "channels_BSCAM" not in result
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_compare_is_ok_when_lists_match_exactly():
|
|
alias_list = [{"alias": "jf03", "channel": "JF03", "channeltype": "JF"}]
|
|
result = compare_channel_lists(alias_list, {"channels_JF": ["JF03"]})
|
|
assert result["channels_JF"]["missing"] == []
|
|
assert result["channels_JF"]["exceeding"] == []
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_compare_respects_list_names_filter():
|
|
alias_list = [
|
|
{"alias": "jf03", "channel": "JF03", "channeltype": "JF"},
|
|
{"alias": "bs1", "channel": "BS:1", "channeltype": "BS"},
|
|
]
|
|
recorded = {"channels_JF": ["JF03"], "channels_BS": ["BS:1"]}
|
|
result = compare_channel_lists(alias_list, recorded, list_names=["channels_JF"])
|
|
assert set(result) == {"channels_JF"}
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_compare_ignores_unknown_list_names():
|
|
result = compare_channel_lists([], {"channels_JF": []}, list_names=["not_a_list"])
|
|
assert result == {}
|